All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
Cc: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Sergey Dyasly <s.dyasly@samsung.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	"Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] vhost-user public struct refactor (was Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] vhost: make buf vector for scatter RX) local.
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:38:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406053800.GU3080@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506067238.174981459919460416.JavaMail.weblogic@eumlwas01>

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 05:11:01AM +0000, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> > There is a plan to use vHost PMD, so from OVS point of view the virtio
> > stuff would be hidden because vhost PMD would look like just as a
> > regular ethernet, right?
> 
> But we still need to have access to virtqueue_enabe/disable notifications to
> work properly. How this will be done if virtqueue will be hidden from user?

Do you mean vring_state_changed() callback? It will not be removed.
BTW, when using vhost pmd, you will not be aware of such callback:
it will be translated to a RTE_ETH_EVENT_QUEUE_STATE interrupt.

OTOH, I have a simple git grep of "vq" from ovs dpdk netdev code,
it returns nothing. So, I don't think that will matter?

	--yliu

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-06  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-06  5:11 [RFC] vhost-user public struct refactor (was Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] vhost: make buf vector for scatter RX) local Ilya Maximets
2016-04-06  5:38 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-06  6:00 Ilya Maximets
2016-02-19  6:32 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Thread safe rte_vhost_enqueue_burst() Ilya Maximets
2016-02-19  6:32 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] vhost: make buf vector for scatter RX local Ilya Maximets
2016-02-19  7:06   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-05  5:47     ` [RFC] vhost-user public struct refactor (was Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] vhost: make buf vector for scatter RX) local Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-05  8:37       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-05 14:06         ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-04-06  4:14       ` Flavio Leitner
2016-04-06  4:54         ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160406053800.GU3080@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fbl@sysclose.org \
    --cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=i.maximets@samsung.com \
    --cc=s.dyasly@samsung.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.