From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: fdmanana@kernel.org
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pass --retry to dmsetup when removing flakey and error devices
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:28:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407212857.GC761@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460009548-20668-1-git-send-email-fdmanana@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 07:12:28AM +0100, fdmanana@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
>
> When running multiple tests using dm's flakey target, often (very rarely)
> I was getting an error when a test tried to setup a dm flakey target,
> resulting in the following messages in the test's .out.bad file:
>
> device-mapper: reload ioctl on flakey-test failed: Device or resource busy
> Command failed
> failed to create flakey device
>
> Upon further investigation it turns out that it was because the previous
> test that ran had failed to remove the flakey device because the device
> was being used at the time but this has not made that previous test fail
> because we simply redirect the stderr (and stdout) to /dev/null and don't
> fail if the dmsetup remove command exits with a non-zero status.
> The device was in use, when the test attempted to remove it, by an udev
> rule (btrfs udev rule).
And that's why we have $UDEV_SETTLE_PROG calls before removing the
dm device, which it appears _dmerror_init() does not have.
If there are things other than udev holding the device open, then we
ned to find what they are first rather than trying to ignore them...
> Fix this by passing the option --retry to dmsetup remove, which serves to
> deal with such cases. From dmsetup's man page:
>
> "If an attempt to remove a device fails, perhaps because a process run
> from a quick udev rule temporarily opened the device, the --retry
> option will cause the operation to be retried for a few seconds before
> failing."
It also talks about udev, so running $UDEV_SETTLE_PROG before remove
should prevent this from happening. If it is not sufficient, then we
need to understand why it is not sufficient, not blindly hack around
it.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 21:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 6:12 [PATCH] Pass --retry to dmsetup when removing flakey and error devices fdmanana
2016-04-07 21:28 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160407212857.GC761@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fdmanana@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.