From: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: "Jan Kundrát" <jkt@kde.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] log: allow --graph and --show-linear-break used together
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:43:38 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160408124338.GA30174@lanh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3305f7dc-0044-41fe-8aab-ee800535d6e9@kde.org>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 01:21:07PM +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> From 1ac6bb7c31652835d3d046c82e423f0cea6e0904 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Jan=20Kundr=C3=A1t?= <jkt@kde.org>
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:06:31 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] log: allow --graph and --show-linear-break used together
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> There was no visual break when --graph --oneline was used with several
> history trees with disjoint parents.
>
> The original reasoning given in commit 1b32decef was probably that a
> graph already conveys enough information to indicate that there's no
> parent-child relation between these two commits. However, this is not
> the case when a single-line prettification of a log is used, in which
> case the commits are displayed on top of each other with no space for
> that graph line to show the separation.
>
> It might be interesting to change the actual printing of the break_bar
> to print fewer line breaks, but this simple approach works and is IMHO
> not that bad visually, anyway.
How about something like this? It does not break the graph, which is
probably better visually, although some may say breaking the graph
_is_ better in this particular case.
I also try to fix the extra blank lines in --oneline mode (with or
without --graph). That's definitely an improvement.
-- 8< --
diff --git a/graph.c b/graph.c
index 1350bdd..deafdd4 100644
--- a/graph.c
+++ b/graph.c
@@ -1226,6 +1226,14 @@ void graph_show_padding(struct git_graph *graph)
strbuf_release(&msgbuf);
}
+void graph_show_vertical_bars(struct git_graph *graph)
+{
+ int saved_width = graph->width;
+ graph->width = 0; /* no extra padding */
+ graph_show_padding(graph);
+ graph->width = saved_width;
+}
+
int graph_show_remainder(struct git_graph *graph)
{
struct strbuf msgbuf = STRBUF_INIT;
diff --git a/graph.h b/graph.h
index 0be62bd..5e55425 100644
--- a/graph.h
+++ b/graph.h
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ void graph_show_oneline(struct git_graph *graph);
*/
void graph_show_padding(struct git_graph *graph);
+void graph_show_vertical_bars(struct git_graph *graph);
+
/*
* If the graph is non-NULL, print the rest of the history graph for this
* commit to stdout. Does not print a terminating newline on the last line.
diff --git a/log-tree.c b/log-tree.c
index 60f9839..61d7cbd 100644
--- a/log-tree.c
+++ b/log-tree.c
@@ -858,6 +858,22 @@ static int log_tree_diff(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit, struct log
return showed_log;
}
+static void show_break_bar(struct rev_info *opt)
+{
+ if (opt->graph) {
+ if (opt->commit_format != CMIT_FMT_ONELINE) {
+ graph_show_vertical_bars(opt->graph);
+ putchar('\n');
+ }
+ graph_show_vertical_bars(opt->graph);
+ printf("%s\n", opt->break_bar);
+ } else {
+ if (opt->commit_format != CMIT_FMT_ONELINE)
+ putchar('\n');
+ printf("%s\n", opt->break_bar);
+ }
+}
+
int log_tree_commit(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit)
{
struct log_info log;
@@ -871,7 +887,7 @@ int log_tree_commit(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit)
return line_log_print(opt, commit);
if (opt->track_linear && !opt->linear && !opt->reverse_output_stage)
- printf("\n%s\n", opt->break_bar);
+ show_break_bar(opt);
shown = log_tree_diff(opt, commit, &log);
if (!shown && opt->loginfo && opt->always_show_header) {
log.parent = NULL;
@@ -879,7 +895,7 @@ int log_tree_commit(struct rev_info *opt, struct commit *commit)
shown = 1;
}
if (opt->track_linear && !opt->linear && opt->reverse_output_stage)
- printf("\n%s\n", opt->break_bar);
+ show_break_bar(opt);
opt->loginfo = NULL;
maybe_flush_or_die(stdout, "stdout");
return shown;
-- 8< --
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kundr??t <jkt@kde.org>
> ---
> Documentation/rev-list-options.txt | 5 +++--
> revision.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> index 4f009d4..c5e487c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> @@ -807,8 +807,9 @@ This implies the `--topo-order` option by default, but the
> `--date-order` option may also be specified.
>
> --show-linear-break[=<barrier>]::
> - When --graph is not used, all history branches are flattened
> - which can make it hard to see that the two consecutive commits
> + If the history is flattened, such as when --graph is not used
> + or if --graph is combined with --oneline to produce a compact
> + view, it can be hard to see that the two consecutive commits
> do not belong to a linear branch. This option puts a barrier
> in between them in that case. If `<barrier>` is specified, it
> is the string that will be shown instead of the default one.
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index 8b2dfe3..809c43e 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -1864,6 +1864,8 @@ static int handle_revision_opt(struct rev_info *revs, int argc, const char **arg
> starts_with(arg, "--show-linear-break=")) {
> if (starts_with(arg, "--show-linear-break="))
> revs->break_bar = xstrdup(arg + 20);
> + else if (revs->graph)
> + revs->break_bar = " ..........\n";
> else
> revs->break_bar = " ..........";
> revs->track_linear = 1;
> @@ -1993,8 +1995,6 @@ static int handle_revision_opt(struct rev_info *revs, int argc, const char **arg
> unkv[(*unkc)++] = arg;
> return opts;
> }
> - if (revs->graph && revs->track_linear)
> - die("--show-linear-break and --graph are incompatible");
>
> return 1;
> }
> --
> 2.7.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 11:21 [PATCH] log: allow --graph and --show-linear-break used together Jan Kundrát
2016-04-08 12:43 ` Duy Nguyen [this message]
2016-04-08 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160408124338.GA30174@lanh \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jkt@kde.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.