From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Greylist: delayed 3622 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at layers.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:11:30 UTC Received: from vms173015pub.verizon.net (vms173015pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.15]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032336FFC8 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vz-proxy-l004.mx.aol.com ([64.236.82.152]) by vms173015.mailsrvcs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.32.0 64bit (built Jul 16 2014)) with ESMTPA id <0O5H00CGZEIKAM50@vms173015.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:11:08 -0500 (CDT) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=WpDWSorv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=a3t/a0oOYlYu/nGe1mf8ZA==:117 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=kziv93cY1bsA:10 a=Q4-j1AaZAAAA:8 a=NGrVYnIGI5pdS84U7hEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: by 100.15.86.14 with SMTP id 585b2b27; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:11:08 GMT Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 15199161F91; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:11:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:11:08 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu Message-id: <20160411181108.GR16135@denix.org> References: MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: James Minor , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] ti-wifi-utils: add recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 19:11:31 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline Resending again, since my previous reply got truncated when sending to the list: On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:50:10AM -0700, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/recipes/?q=ti-wifi-utils > > > > Yes, it is a duplicate. How about keeping the recipe in meta-oe to make > > it usable without adding arago distributions layers? > > Well, it is currently NOT in the distribution layer, but rather in the > application layer... But I guess I'm fine submitting the latest version to > meta-oe, once I'm back from ELC.