All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	'Joe Stringer' <joe@ovn.org>,
	"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"diproiettod@vmware.com" <diproiettod@vmware.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: ipv6: Orphan skbs in nf_ct_frag6_gather()
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:35:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160414103533.GA3211@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160414084015.GA3192@breakpoint.cc>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:40:15AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:
> > From: Joe Stringer
> > > Sent: 13 April 2016 19:10
> > > This is the IPv6 equivalent of commit 8282f27449bf ("inet: frag: Always
> > > orphan skbs inside ip_defrag()").
> > > 
> > > Prior to commit 029f7f3b8701 ("netfilter: ipv6: nf_defrag: avoid/free
> > > clone operations"), ipv6 fragments sent to nf_ct_frag6_gather() would be
> > > cloned (implicitly orphaning) prior to queueing for reassembly. As such,
> > > when the IPv6 message is eventually reassembled, the skb->sk for all
> > > fragments would be NULL. After that commit was introduced, rather than
> > > cloning, the original skbs were queued directly without orphaning. The
> > > end result is that all frags except for the first and last may have a
> > > socket attached.
> > 
> > I'd have thought that the queued fragments would still want to be
> > resource-counted against the socket (I think that is what skb->sk is for).
> 
> No, ipv4/ipv6 reasm has its own accouting.
> 
> > Although I can't imagine why IPv6 reassembly is happening on skb
> > associated with a socket.
> 
> Right, thats a much more interesting question -- both ipv4 and
> ipv6 orphan skbs before NF_HOOK prerouting trip.
> 
> (That being said, I don't mind the patch, I'm just be curious how this
>  can happen).

If this change is specific to get this working in ovs and its
conntrack support, then I don't think this belong to core
infrastructure. This should be fixed in ovs instead.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-14 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-13 18:09 [PATCH nf] netfilter: ipv6: Orphan skbs in nf_ct_frag6_gather() Joe Stringer
2016-04-14  8:31 ` David Laight
2016-04-14  8:40   ` Florian Westphal
2016-04-14 10:35     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-04-15  0:35       ` Joe Stringer
2016-04-18 18:35         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-04-18 21:49           ` Joe Stringer
2016-04-15  0:14     ` Joe Stringer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160414103533.GA3211@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=diproiettod@vmware.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=joe@ovn.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.