Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] usb: otg-fsm: Prevent build warning "VDBG" redefined

[Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 10:13:52AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> On 06/04/16 09:46, Peter Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 04:48:19PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Peter,
> >>
> >> On 05/04/16 15:52, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> Peter,
> >>>
> >>> On 05/04/16 11:52, Peter Chen wrote:
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:41:19PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>>>> If usb/otg-fsm.h and usb/composite.h are included together
> >>>>> then it results in the build warning [1].
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Prevent that by using dev_vdbg() instead.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> After considering it more, I think it may not be a good solution
> >>>> that we delete VDBG at one header file, but keep it at another
> >>>> one. In future, we may add VDBG at another file, and cause the
> >>>> same problem. In fact, I find VDBG is defined at several files
> >>>> in USB folder (and only at USB folder), I plan to replace them
> >>>> with standard one (dev_vdbg) together.
> >>>
> >>> OK, please ignore this patch then.
> >>
> >> On second thoughts can you please retain this patch and post the
> >> VDBG removal from composite.h cleanup separately?
> >>
> > 
> > I find the struct usb_otg has a struct device pointer, and you changes
> > all fsm stuffs under struct usb_otg (like otg.fsm) in your later patches,
> > then, would you please refine this patch that just using otg->dev for
> > print and move VDBG to phy-fsl-usb.c, of course, you need to move this
> > patch in that patch series.
> 
> OK. I'll rework this patch and include it in the otg series.
> 

I have already queued your 1st and 2nd patch at my tree.

-- 

Best Regards,
Peter Chen