From: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v9 1/5] nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:46:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160420164647.GA29474@tevye.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4i4hh3PYjDk823u4rnqHB-Xh=1V19pxLUXAF0JyJiyvLA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:15:24PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> wrote:
> > Add ioctl command ND_CMD_CALL_DSM to acpi_nfit_ctl and __nd_ioctl which
> > allow kernel to call a nvdimm's _DSM as a passthru without using the
> > marshaling code of the nd_cmd_desc.
> >
> > This supports DSM as defined in:
> >
> > http://pmem.io/documents/NVDIMM_DSM_Interface_Example.pdf
> > https://github.com/HewlettPackard/hpe-nvm/tree/master/Documentation
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/nfit.c | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > drivers/nvdimm/bus.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> > index d0f35e6..7dffcb5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> > @@ -56,6 +56,24 @@ struct nfit_table_prev {
> > struct list_head flushes;
> > };
> >
> > +struct cmd_family_tbl {
> > + enum nfit_uuids key_uuid; /* Internal handle */
> > + int key_type; /* Exported handle */
> > + int rev; /* _DSM rev */
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * If adding new cmd family, determine maximum function index
> > + */
> > +#define ND_MAX_CMD 20
> > +
> > +struct cmd_family_tbl nfit_cmd_family_tbl[] = {
>
> Should be 'static', probably 'const' as well.
Yes.
>
> > + { NFIT_DEV_DIMM, ND_TYPE_DIMM_INTEL1, 1},
> > + { NFIT_DEV_DIMM_N_HPE1, ND_TYPE_DIMM_N_HPE1, 1},
> > + { NFIT_DEV_DIMM_N_HPE2, ND_TYPE_DIMM_N_HPE2, 1},
> > + { -1, -1, -1},
> > +};
> > +
...
> >
> > + if (call_dsm) {
> > + call_dsm->nd_fw_size = out_obj->buffer.length;
> > + memcpy(call_dsm->nd_payload + call_dsm->nd_size_in,
> > + out_obj->buffer.pointer,
> > + min(call_dsm->nd_fw_size, call_dsm->nd_size_out));
>
> Hmm, further down in this routine we return -ENXIO if the output
> payload is too small, 0 if the output payload exactly matches the size
> of the BIOS output, and a positive number of remaining bytes if the
> output payload is larger than the BIOS output. Yes, we can calculate
> this same result ourselves from the contents of the nd_cmd_pkg
> structure, but lets make the return value common for all the ioctls.
> Especially for the error case where we shouldn't successfully complete
> the ioctl if userspace failed to provide enough buffer space.
> +
> + ACPI_FREE(out_obj);
> + return 0;
> + }
Disagree. We've discussed this previously. The passthru interface needs
to handle the case where the caller doesn't know in advance the size
of the return. These cases are not errors, just a different semantic.
....
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
> > index 19f822d..0c1c4ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/bus.c
> > @@ -439,6 +439,12 @@ static const struct nd_cmd_desc __nd_cmd_dimm_descs[] = {
> > .out_num = 3,
> > .out_sizes = { 4, 4, UINT_MAX, },
> > },
> > + [ND_CMD_CALL] = {
> > + .in_num = 2,
> > + .in_sizes = {sizeof(struct nd_cmd_pkg), UINT_MAX, },
>
> This caught my eye, and I'm not sure if checkpatch catches it, but
> lets have a space between the '{' and 'sizeof' to match the style of
> the other initializations in this array.
Fine.
>
> > + .out_num = 1,
> > + .out_sizes = { UINT_MAX, },
> > + },
> > };
> >
> > const struct nd_cmd_desc *nd_cmd_dimm_desc(int cmd)
> > @@ -473,6 +479,12 @@ static const struct nd_cmd_desc __nd_cmd_bus_descs[] = {
> > .out_num = 3,
> > .out_sizes = { 4, 4, 8, },
> > },
> > + [ND_CMD_CALL] = {
> > + .in_num = 2,
> > + .in_sizes = {sizeof(struct nd_cmd_pkg), UINT_MAX, },
>
> Ditto.
Fine.
..
> > @@ -522,6 +538,12 @@ u32 nd_cmd_out_size(struct nvdimm *nvdimm, int cmd,
> > return out_field[1];
> > else if (!nvdimm && cmd == ND_CMD_ARS_STATUS && idx == 2)
> > return out_field[1] - 8;
> > + else if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL) {
> > + struct nd_cmd_pkg *pkg =
> > + (struct nd_cmd_pkg *) in_field;
>
> checkpatch should warn about a missing newline between declarations
> and code here.
struct nd_cmd_pkg had a longer named in past, hence breaking line not to
exceed 80 characters.
Will make one line and add \n.
>
> > + return pkg->nd_size_out;
> > + }
> > +
> >
> > return UINT_MAX;
> > }
> > @@ -588,7 +610,9 @@ static int __nd_ioctl(struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus, struct nvdimm *nvdimm,
> > unsigned int cmd = _IOC_NR(ioctl_cmd);
> > void __user *p = (void __user *) arg;
> > struct device *dev = &nvdimm_bus->dev;
> > + struct nd_cmd_pkg call_dsm;
>
> Sometimes this patch uses 'call_dsm' as the local variable name of a
> struct nd_cmd_pkg, and sometimes 'pkg'. Lets just use 'pkg'
> everywhere.
Fine.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvdimm mailing list
Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 23:38 [RFC v9 0/5] nvdimm: Add an IOCTL pass thru for DSM calls Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-17 23:38 ` [RFC v9 1/5] nvdimm: Add IOCTL pass thru functions Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-18 8:07 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-19 2:15 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-20 16:46 ` Jerry Hoemann [this message]
2016-04-20 20:08 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-20 22:55 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-21 1:29 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-21 11:39 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-17 23:38 ` [RFC v9 2/5] libnvdimm: nvdimm_bus_descriptor field name change Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-18 8:08 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-17 23:38 ` [RFC v9 3/5] Subject: [PATCH v8 07/10] tools/testing/nvdimm: 'call_dsm' support Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-18 8:08 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-19 2:22 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-20 16:50 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-17 23:38 ` [RFC v9 4/5] nvdimm: Add concept of cmd mask Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-18 8:09 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-19 3:03 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-21 17:28 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-21 18:25 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-22 17:55 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-22 18:16 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-17 23:38 ` [RFC v9 5/5] nvdimm: Add ioctl to return command mask Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-18 8:09 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2016-04-19 17:45 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-20 17:41 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-21 11:52 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-21 16:52 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-21 18:18 ` Dan Williams
2016-04-22 23:15 ` Jerry Hoemann
2016-04-22 23:33 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160420164647.GA29474@tevye.fc.hp.com \
--to=jerry.hoemann@hpe.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.