All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama@163.com,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/13] bpf tools: Replace fd array to union array
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:20:37 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160420192037.GT3677@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461175313-38310-5-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com>

Em Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 06:01:44PM +0000, Wang Nan escreveu:
> Following commits will add new types for instance of a bpf program.
> For kernel bpf program, a program instance is fd. For ubpf program,
> the instance of a program is a 'struct ubpf_vm'. This patch promote
> original 'fds' array to 'union prog_instance' array, prepare for
> further extending.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 55b739e..dd5a107 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ int libbpf_strerror(int err, char *buf, size_t size)
>  # define LIBBPF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP ELF_C_READ
>  #endif
>  
> +union prog_instance {
> +	int fd;
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * bpf_prog should be a better name but it has been used in
>   * linux/filter.h.
> @@ -157,7 +161,7 @@ struct bpf_program {
>  
>  	struct {
>  		int nr;
> -		int *fds;
> +		union prog_instance *array;
>  	} instances;

Why not just do:

	struct {
		int nr;
		union {
			int *fds;
		};
	} instances;

And then do no further changes and when going to the ubpf (haven't
looked at the actual patch, proposing this based on your above
description), just transform it into:

	struct {
		int nr;
		union {
			int		*fds;
			struct ubpf_vm	*vms;
		};
	} instances;

Or plain use a void pointer and use:

	struct {
		int  nr;
		void *entries;
	} instances;

	if (prog->instances.nr > 0) {
		int *fds = prog->instances.entries;

		for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++)
			zclose(fd[i]);
	}

>  	bpf_program_prep_t preprocessor;
>  
> @@ -229,14 +233,14 @@ static void bpf_program__unload(struct bpf_program *prog)
>  	 */
>  	if (prog->instances.nr > 0) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < prog->instances.nr; i++)
> -			zclose(prog->instances.fds[i]);
> +			zclose(prog->instances.array[i].fd);
>  	} else if (prog->instances.nr != -1) {
>  		pr_warning("Internal error: instances.nr is %d\n",
>  			   prog->instances.nr);
>  	}
>  
>  	prog->instances.nr = -1;
> -	zfree(&prog->instances.fds);
> +	zfree(&prog->instances.array);
>  }
>  
>  static void bpf_program__exit(struct bpf_program *prog)
> @@ -287,7 +291,7 @@ bpf_program__init(void *data, size_t size, char *name, int idx,
>  	memcpy(prog->insns, data,
>  	       prog->insns_cnt * sizeof(struct bpf_insn));
>  	prog->idx = idx;
> -	prog->instances.fds = NULL;
> +	prog->instances.array = NULL;
>  	prog->instances.nr = -1;
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -937,20 +941,20 @@ bpf_program__load(struct bpf_program *prog,
>  {
>  	int err = 0, fd, i;
>  
> -	if (prog->instances.nr < 0 || !prog->instances.fds) {
> +	if (prog->instances.nr < 0 || !prog->instances.array) {
>  		if (prog->preprocessor) {
>  			pr_warning("Internal error: can't load program '%s'\n",
>  				   prog->section_name);
>  			return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__INTERNAL;
>  		}
>  
> -		prog->instances.fds = malloc(sizeof(int));
> -		if (!prog->instances.fds) {
> -			pr_warning("Not enough memory for BPF fds\n");
> +		prog->instances.array = malloc(sizeof(union prog_instance));
> +		if (!prog->instances.array) {
> +			pr_warning("Not enough memory for BPF instance\n");
>  			return -ENOMEM;
>  		}
>  		prog->instances.nr = 1;
> -		prog->instances.fds[0] = -1;
> +		prog->instances.array[0].fd = -1;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!prog->preprocessor) {
> @@ -961,7 +965,7 @@ bpf_program__load(struct bpf_program *prog,
>  		err = load_program(prog->insns, prog->insns_cnt,
>  				   license, kern_version, &fd);
>  		if (!err)
> -			prog->instances.fds[0] = fd;
> +			prog->instances.array[0].fd = fd;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -981,7 +985,7 @@ bpf_program__load(struct bpf_program *prog,
>  		if (!result.new_insn_ptr || !result.new_insn_cnt) {
>  			pr_debug("Skip loading the %dth instance of program '%s'\n",
>  				 i, prog->section_name);
> -			prog->instances.fds[i] = -1;
> +			prog->instances.array[i].fd = -1;
>  			if (result.pfd)
>  				*result.pfd = -1;
>  			continue;
> @@ -999,7 +1003,7 @@ bpf_program__load(struct bpf_program *prog,
>  
>  		if (result.pfd)
>  			*result.pfd = fd;
> -		prog->instances.fds[i] = fd;
> +		prog->instances.array[i].fd = fd;
>  	}
>  out:
>  	if (err)
> @@ -1269,27 +1273,27 @@ int bpf_program__fd(struct bpf_program *prog)
>  int bpf_program__set_prep(struct bpf_program *prog, int nr_instances,
>  			  bpf_program_prep_t prep)
>  {
> -	int *instances_fds;
> +	union prog_instance *array;
>  
>  	if (nr_instances <= 0 || !prep)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (prog->instances.nr > 0 || prog->instances.fds) {
> +	if (prog->instances.nr > 0 || prog->instances.array) {
>  		pr_warning("Can't set pre-processor after loading\n");
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	instances_fds = malloc(sizeof(int) * nr_instances);
> -	if (!instances_fds) {
> -		pr_warning("alloc memory failed for fds\n");
> +	array = malloc(sizeof(array[0]) * nr_instances);
> +	if (!array) {
> +		pr_warning("alloc memory failed for instances\n");
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* fill all fd with -1 */
> -	memset(instances_fds, -1, sizeof(int) * nr_instances);
> +	memset(array, -1, sizeof(array[0]) * nr_instances);
>  
>  	prog->instances.nr = nr_instances;
> -	prog->instances.fds = instances_fds;
> +	prog->instances.array = array;
>  	prog->preprocessor = prep;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1304,7 +1308,7 @@ int bpf_program__nth_fd(struct bpf_program *prog, int n)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	fd = prog->instances.fds[n];
> +	fd = prog->instances.array[n].fd;
>  	if (fd < 0) {
>  		pr_warning("%dth instance of program '%s' is invalid\n",
>  			   n, prog->section_name);
> -- 
> 1.8.3.4

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20 18:01 [RFC PATCH 00/13] perf tools: Support uBPF script Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 01/13] bpf tools: Add map related BPF helper Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 02/13] tools: Add ubpf feature test Wang Nan
2016-04-20 19:11   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 03/13] bpf tools: Add ubpf include and makefile options Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 04/13] bpf tools: Replace fd array to union array Wang Nan
2016-04-20 19:20   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 05/13] bpf tools: Save engine type in bpf_program Wang Nan
2016-04-20 19:23   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 19:29     ` pi3orama
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 06/13] bpf tools: Introduce ubpf_vm to program instance union Wang Nan
2016-04-20 19:30   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 07/13] bpf tools: Load ubpf program Wang Nan
2016-04-20 19:34   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 08/13] bpf tools: Add API for fetching ubpf_vm Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 09/13] bpf tools: Register extern functions for ubpf programs Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 10/13] perf tools: Register basic UBPF helpers Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 11/13] perf bpf: Accept ubpf programs Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 12/13] perf record: Add UBPF hooks at beginning and end of perf record Wang Nan
2016-04-20 18:01 ` [RFC PATCH 13/13] perf tests: Add UBPF test case Wang Nan
2016-04-20 22:06 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] perf tools: Support uBPF script Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-21  8:17   ` Wangnan (F)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160420192037.GT3677@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.