From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-tests: Makefile: Assume numa_parse_cpustring_all available
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:08:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421120854.490ce681@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1604211736070.11619@riemann>
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> wrote:
> From 5e5a1cb500a26b63aff8a19a2669e224c5d6e87a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:29:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] rt-tests: Makefile: Assume numa_parse_cpustring_all available
>
> NUMA users should have long ago stepped up to libs that have
> numa_parse_cpustring_all(). Make this the default so that we can include
> isolated cpus in the affinity string.
>
> If there are any NUMA users or distros left that have old libraries that
> don't have numa_parse_cpu_string_all(), and only numa_parse_cpu_string()
> they can compile like this
>
> make HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL=0
>
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 280fd3bec979..ff1d1b0554a3 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -57,16 +57,17 @@ ifneq ($(filter x86_64 i386 ia64 mips powerpc,$(machinetype)),)
> NUMA := 1
> endif
>
> -# The default is to assume that you only have numa_parse_cpustring
> -# If you are sure you have a version of libnuma with numa_parse_cpustring_all
> +# The default is to assume that you have numa_parse_cpustring_all
> +# If you have an older version of libnuma that only has numa_parse_cpustring
> # then compile with
> -# make HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL=1
> +# make HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL=0
> +HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL?=1
> ifeq ($(NUMA),1)
> CFLAGS += -DNUMA
> NUMA_LIBS = -lnuma
> -ifdef HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL
> - CFLAGS += -DHAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL
> -endif
> + ifeq ($(HAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL),1)
> + CFLAGS += -DHAVE_PARSE_CPUSTRING_ALL
> + endif
> endif
>
> include src/arch/android/Makefile
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 15:38 [PATCH] rt-tests: Makefile: Assume numa_parse_cpustring_all available John Kacur
2016-04-21 16:08 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160421120854.490ce681@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.