All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] documentation: ACQUIRE applies to loads, RELEASE applies to stores
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:14:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160422171422.GF3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160422143222.GU3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:32:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:41:49AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > For compound atomics performing both a load and a store operation, make
> > it clear that _acquire and _release variants refer only to the load and
> > store portions of compound atomic. For example, xchg_acquire is an xchg
> > operation where the load takes on ACQUIRE semantics.
> > 
> > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

Queued, thank you both!

							Thanx, Paul

> > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> > index 3729cbe60e41..05f8011011be 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> > @@ -464,6 +464,11 @@ And a couple of implicit varieties:
> >       This means that ACQUIRE acts as a minimal "acquire" operation and
> >       RELEASE acts as a minimal "release" operation.
> >  
> > +A subset of the atomic operations described in atomic_ops.txt have ACQUIRE
> > +and RELEASE variants in addition to fully-ordered and relaxed (no barrier
> > +semantics) definitions.  For compound atomics performing both a load and a
> > +store, ACQUIRE semantics apply only to the load and RELEASE semantics apply
> > +only to the store portion of the operation.
> >  
> >  Memory barriers are only required where there's a possibility of interaction
> >  between two CPUs or between a CPU and a device.  If it can be guaranteed that
> > -- 
> > 2.1.4
> > 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-22 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22 10:41 [PATCH] documentation: ACQUIRE applies to loads, RELEASE applies to stores Will Deacon
2016-04-22 14:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-22 17:14   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160422171422.GF3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.