Re: [PATCH 3/3] regulator: twl: Regulator mode should not depend on regulator enabled state

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

On Sat 2016-03-26 10:28:15, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> When machine constraints are applied, regulator framework first sets
> initial mode (if any) and then enables the regulator if needed. The current
> code in twl4030reg_set_mode always checks if the regulator is enabled
> before applying the mode. That results in -EACCES error returned for
> "always-on" regulators which have "initial-mode" set in the board DTS. Fix
> that by removing the unneeded check.

Should we keep the check for the regulators that are _not_ always-on?

Thanks,
									Pavel

> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
> index be8d05e..d8f6ad6 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c
> @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ static int twl4030reg_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned mode)
>  {
>  	struct twlreg_info	*info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>  	unsigned		message;
> -	int			status;
>  
>  	/* We can only set the mode through state machine commands... */
>  	switch (mode) {
> @@ -385,13 +384,6 @@ static int twl4030reg_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev, unsigned mode)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Ensure the resource is associated with some group */
> -	status = twlreg_grp(rdev);
> -	if (status < 0)
> -		return status;
> -	if (!(status & (P3_GRP_4030 | P2_GRP_4030 | P1_GRP_4030)))
> -		return -EACCES;
> -
>  	return twl4030_send_pb_msg(message);
>  }
>  

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html