From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.153]:54733 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752036AbcDXWrm (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2016 18:47:42 -0400 Received: from localhost by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:47:37 -0600 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.25]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C246F1FF0021 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:47:19 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u3OMlXhg38863008 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 22:47:33 GMT Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u3OMlX9a008544 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 18:47:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:48:08 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] qqz: Improve accuracy of cross-links Message-ID: <20160424224808.GX3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <571C1843.1060906@gmail.com> <571C1C8F.9000602@gmail.com> <571C42A1.8060201@gmail.com> <571C6CBB.4080101@gmail.com> <571CD6E7.4060301@gmail.com> <20160424175701.GU3756@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <571D4684.2030007@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <571D4684.2030007@gmail.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Akira Yokosawa Cc: perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:19:48AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On 2016/04/24 10:57:01 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:23:35PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > > [snip] > > >> There was no change in the behavior. > > > > Ah, that would explain the lack of complaints. Most people reading > > the book on a mobile device use perfbook-1c.pdf, so the chapter > > links would work nicely for them. > > Then, wouldn't it be nicer if we change the default target in Makefile > to perfbook-1c.pdf ? > > Or how about just adding a shorter name target such as "1c" that would > build perfbook-1c.pdf ? > > Of course, we should be careful enough not to annoy people by a > sudden change of behavior. I prefer the double-column layout because it takes less paper to print. But having "make 1c" create the single-column layout would be fine. Thanx, Paul > >> I'm very glad I can contribute the perfbook project in this manner. > >> > >> So far, patches I submitted were mostly cosmetic changes. > >> I'm planning to submit something that touches the actual contents, too. > >> But don't expect too much. > > > > Cosmetic it might be, but I believe that readers will appreciate it > > very much! Thank you again! > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > >