From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 26D6AE00CF9; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [74.125.82.46 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74977E00CA1 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id e201so77095084wme.0 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:33:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gherzan-ro.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O2bW2qnbY9Nob9HXfflh0mW8ttumhbbplDiMrdhmZJg=; b=gbyPoEFYxyWbT5f/cjFVGKGDSR1Q/cqjX3yRxbS2o6fG0svwhIEjO5njTirqeS22ly I2+mM7i+nWqF8MGmBnrIaejk3Y9aeq506ShNXi1Tt/AUwv/VXuFYBayDWWq6tuAO3DMv FFpTO2tbXfO7AAgE0BSLYcW9sPUq90Efp0MLXiuy5FnyA5nL0yOhKqmI1CkseOqb5Bas uPOTvqvYZyzvICnab/8UgUnLT3oD9SyjMgyYeQMmcY1SupDAC/eFqWM+dth595+Jhm9G CSUFD+8YSVydGqpvzjqH/Rvwp2A9wAHe3UVBYaioMoD/GIzo6S+VREbutsJaOWMTFr6g NEyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=O2bW2qnbY9Nob9HXfflh0mW8ttumhbbplDiMrdhmZJg=; b=DqPwL+wxET5UsbmtaR7BXKKtnsbORbpshQIFryF8i06Pvdvff/V0qEYpo7rbeeLmiL edn/Fblj0sGNnfo1DKomgcCahjDUAFPkRnd8AgruycA4fMegMwl/vp6kjIOSiDdWvJ+K zwu8JSrmYSsyV9YvPewkiluPgWRaM6fI+nGGLeGz9KHaZuUGNHJxHPScE7mhB7yVFWdw A3WBdSdtkeA8QRgHB3guHHfaCW6gqact1BYjwcSrToKfWPr5YFuBvDKmg6vvdlXX6zHh j/kDzp3IXbFJxqXD1CdrUkev1MzBQzJ8+zzMPUILLpHlhKJEZQ7qEO6u2A/qh/8lsxtl GNMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXpveIRrkCT6/MRMN1D9O9KtJc+R8u+5cg2xIYHp68YKHf5ioEKCv8sANvx840n9g== X-Received: by 10.194.176.129 with SMTP id ci1mr32601471wjc.166.1461573195722; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:33:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resin ([2a02:8108:9b40:1710:5ee0:c5ff:fec8:435d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o73sm17546991wme.16.2016.04.25.01.33.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 01:33:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:33:12 +0200 From: Andrei Gherzan To: Steve Rae Message-ID: <20160425083312.GF26977@resin> References: <1453755618-11640-1-git-send-email-srae@broadcom.com> <789D469E-10A9-4DC2-9232-2955580421CD@gmail.com> <56A6BE9B.9050207@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56A6BE9B.9050207@broadcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] u-boot-rpi2: use the upstreamed U-Boot X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:33:19 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 29612 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bqc0IY4JZZt50bUr" Content-Disposition: inline --Bqc0IY4JZZt50bUr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Steve, On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:32:27PM -0800, Steve Rae wrote: > > > On 16-01-25 01:32 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi Steve > > > > > On Jan 25, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Steve Rae wrote: > > > > > > For Raspberry Pi 2, use the U-Boot from "den". > > > > > > Can this be done by using/extending OE-Core recipe please ? > > > > > > I modelled it after the existing RPi recipe: > diff recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rpi_git.bb > recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-rpi2_git.bb > sorry -- I don't know enough about this to answer your question... > Which recipe should I "extend"? Could you please provide more details? > Thanks in advance, Steve Khem Raj is proposing to use a uboot recipe from oe-core https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot and extend it with a bbappend to include rpi support. Is that possible? P.S.: Sorry for this late reply. I'm trying to catch up with some old threads. -- Andrei Gherzan --Bqc0IY4JZZt50bUr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXHdZIAAoJEHO76Gt+erfPdl0P/j1Q7Ww5TFKL+vaTyi1nhBQD DfgN3VakRs9ZuHvgcNyRChQVEHr8nbQyDK3csoa9EUCWmkHH5NcnGoYFBOJRSJ1X SDykCRlrYd+DDJWiiEeN8n0Ggcxjwm0jcBMLXzmhbUqk0Pw4iegNlAsRmjvYJsRs Na2D8h5TO7tQtU0g+CupD2Fn9Tr0MANf2kLp34IhkOv58iL5a6RDhtszfUoBbXh4 SOa5ld1GQcIA/D97RUwgm3hnRPzkrC37tWXJBoFCj7Qg1iVHP/GEsQasYWNBDGLC /uOXcqEdfyWUM0YW37+IbW2zJe0wC/H/5rby9r+fJM81OcOxZ0aPQemTnhRTkEZG 0uSx8iUOtPbTrKpHvgNGtc0MJ+n/cTDAYYQpDRkKtW/7/mBCUhCkvH27L7nAJ2t3 bt9ByjYyFMv/c0rMvsIW0ROo0jWE3eJP3eM0jA1TmZejamrRIpYNOLzgJRwpSL+t 1mnh+VWAcb8EPcYpPZk27fJXRXqAIgjDRi1TJgEDDJE5gPhPsrWDOsZDpTxfy1et 0QGlvlP0IMRv40Br8DLTwgSAu5RDSZ6fXdNxezFOQrj86a7N6Ehuy/7Un+0G7l9U GHoJ37rGq06sN7to4UauaffAvyRMMSbqWHozzWeW4gunG7rPQiL4Y/bJgQYwyUyO bsDcg5oRAvdm1Grxt5pO =8mk1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bqc0IY4JZZt50bUr--