All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	boqun.feng@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] powerpc: Implement {cmp}xchg for u8 and u16
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:37:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425153710.GG3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <571DED2B.8060600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:10:51PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> > So I'm not actually _that_ familiar with the PPC LL/SC implementation;
> > but there are things a CPU can do to optimize these loops.
> > 
> > For example, a CPU might choose to not release the exclusive hold of the
> > line for a number of cycles, except when it passes SC or an interrupt
> > happens. This way there's a smaller chance the SC fails and inhibits
> > forward progress.

> I am not sure if there is such hardware optimization.

So I think the hardware must do _something_, otherwise competing cores
doing load-exlusive could life-lock a system, each one endlessly
breaking the exclusive ownership of the other and the store-conditional
always failing.

Of course, there are such implementations, and they tend to have to put
in explicit backoff loops; however, IIRC, PPC doesn't need that. (See
ARC for an example that needs to do this.)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-25 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-19  6:29 [PATCH V2] powerpc: Implement {cmp}xchg for u8 and u16 Pan Xinhui
2016-04-19  9:18 ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-19  9:18   ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-20  3:39   ` Pan Xinhui
2016-04-20 13:24 ` [PATCH V3] " Pan Xinhui
2016-04-20 14:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-21 15:35     ` Pan Xinhui
2016-04-21 15:52       ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-22  1:59         ` Pan Xinhui
2016-04-22  3:16           ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-21 16:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 10:10         ` Pan Xinhui
2016-04-25 15:37           ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-26 11:35             ` Pan Xinhui
2016-04-27  9:16   ` [PATCH V4] " Pan Xinhui
2016-04-27 13:58     ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-27 14:16       ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-27 14:50       ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-27 14:59         ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-28 10:21           ` Pan Xinhui
2016-04-28  7:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-28 10:21       ` Pan Xinhui
2016-11-25  0:04     ` [V4] " Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160425153710.GG3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.