From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done during gpu reset, v2.
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:33:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425163339.GE4329@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460355814-3599-2-git-send-email-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:23:34AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Add force_reset_modeset_test as a parameter to force the modeset path during gpu reset.
> This allows a IGT test to set the knob and trigger a hang to force the gpu reset,
> even on platforms that wouldn't otherwise require it.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Split out fix to separate commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Testcase: drv_hangman.reset-with-forced-modeset
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> index 1779f02e6df8..80ce581793dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct i915_params i915 __read_mostly = {
> .fastboot = 0,
> .prefault_disable = 0,
> .load_detect_test = 0,
> + .force_reset_modeset_test = 0,
> .reset = true,
> .invert_brightness = 0,
> .disable_display = 0,
> @@ -158,6 +159,11 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(load_detect_test,
> "Force-enable the VGA load detect code for testing (default:false). "
> "For developers only.");
>
> +module_param_named_unsafe(force_reset_modeset_test, i915.force_reset_modeset_test, bool, 0600);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(force_reset_modeset_test,
> + "Force a modeset during gpu reset for testing (default:false). "
> + "For developers only.");
> +
> module_param_named_unsafe(invert_brightness, i915.invert_brightness, int, 0600);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(invert_brightness,
> "Invert backlight brightness "
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> index 02bc27804291..3934c4300427 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_params.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ struct i915_params {
> bool fastboot;
> bool prefault_disable;
> bool load_detect_test;
> + bool force_reset_modeset_test;
> bool reset;
> bool disable_display;
> bool enable_guc_submission;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 2f76efc86417..faf2da08778f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -3160,6 +3160,7 @@ __intel_display_resume(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> void intel_prepare_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> + bool requires_display_reset = true;
> struct drm_atomic_state *state;
> struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx *pctx;
> int ret;
> @@ -3169,8 +3170,12 @@ void intel_prepare_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> return;
>
> /* reset doesn't touch the display */
> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev))
> - return;
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev)) {
> + if (!i915.force_reset_modeset_test)
> + return;
> +
> + requires_display_reset = false;
> + }
>
> drm_modeset_lock_all(dev);
> pctx = dev->mode_config.acquire_ctx;
> @@ -3199,12 +3204,15 @@ void intel_prepare_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> err:
> drm_atomic_state_free(state);
> + if (!requires_display_reset)
> + drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
Why do we want to unlock here?
> }
>
> void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> struct drm_atomic_state *state = dev_priv->modeset_restore_state;
> + bool hpd_init;
> int ret;
>
> /*
> @@ -3220,22 +3228,27 @@ void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> /* reset doesn't touch the display */
> if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 5 || IS_G4X(dev)) {
> - /*
> - * Flips in the rings have been nuked by the reset,
> - * so update the base address of all primary
> - * planes to the the last fb to make sure we're
> - * showing the correct fb after a reset.
> - *
> - * FIXME: Atomic will make this obsolete since we won't schedule
> - * CS-based flips (which might get lost in gpu resets) any more.
> - */
> - intel_update_primary_planes(dev);
> - return;
> + hpd_init = false;
> +
> + if (!state) {
> + /*
> + * Flips in the rings have been nuked by the reset,
> + * so update the base address of all primary
> + * planes to the the last fb to make sure we're
> + * showing the correct fb after a reset.
> + *
> + * FIXME: Atomic will make this obsolete since we won't schedule
> + * CS-based flips (which might get lost in gpu resets) any more.
> + */
> + intel_update_primary_planes(dev);
For this I guess. Hmm. Maybe hang on to the lock anyway, and add a
new flag in dev_priv or something to indicate if we're performing
a display reset or not. I suppose we could check for
(pre-g4x || i915.whatever) on either side, but that could
be problematic if someone changes the modparam mid-flight.
So finish_reset could perhaps looks something like (assuming we don't
want to run through the whole display init sequence on g4x+):
{
if (!dev_priv->display_reset) {
intel_update_primary_planes();
return;
}
if (pre-g4x) {
...
ret = display_resume();
init_hpd();
} else {
ret = display_resume();
}
unlock_all();
}
> + return;
> + }
> } else {
> /*
> * The display has been reset as well,
> * so need a full re-initialization.
> */
> + hpd_init = true;
> intel_runtime_pm_disable_interrupts(dev_priv);
> intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
>
> @@ -3255,7 +3268,8 @@ void intel_finish_reset(struct drm_device *dev)
> if (ret)
> DRM_ERROR("Restoring old state failed with %i\n", ret);
>
> - intel_hpd_init(dev_priv);
> + if (hpd_init)
> + intel_hpd_init(dev_priv);
>
> drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 10:56 [PATCH] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done during gpu reset Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-05 11:00 ` [PATCH i-g-t] drv_hangman: Add test for modeset " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-11 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Fix modeset handling " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-11 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done during gpu reset, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-25 16:33 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2016-04-20 7:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/i915: Fix modeset handling during gpu reset Maarten Lankhorst
2016-04-25 16:10 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 13:01 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Add a way to test the modeset done " Ville Syrjälä
2016-04-05 13:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425163339.GE4329@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.