From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
Cc: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
tony.luck@intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@kernel.org, h.peter.anvin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf/x86/mbm: Store bytes counted for mbm during recycle
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:02:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160425200222.GM3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1604251051120.18257@vshiva-Udesk>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:04:38AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> >This is a 'creative' solution; why don't you do the normal thing, which
> >is:
> >
> >start:
> > prev_count = read_hw_counter();
> >
> >read:
> > do {
> > prev = prev_count;
> > cur_val = read_hw_counter();
> > delta = cur_val - prev;
> > } while (local_cmpxchg(&prev_count, prev, cur_val) != prev);
> > count += delta;
>
>
> I may need to update the comment.
>
> rc_count stores the total bytes for RMIDs that were used for this event
> except for the count of current RMID.
Yeah, I got that, eventually.
> Say an event used RMID(1) .. RMID(k) from init to read and it had RMID(k)
> when read was called, the rc_count stores the values read from RMID1 ..
> RMID(k-1).
>
> For MBM the patch is trying to do:
> count
> = total_bytes of RMID(1) + ... +total_bytes of RMID(k-1) + total_bytes of
> RMID(k))
> = rc_count + total_bytes of RMID(k).
How is the regular counting scheme as outlined above not dealing with
this properly?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-23 0:27 [PATCH V1 0/4] Urgent fixes for Intel CQM/MBM counting Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf/x86/cqm,mbm: Store cqm,mbm count for all events when RMID is recycled Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:26 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf/x86/mbm: Store bytes counted for mbm during recycle Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 18:04 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 20:02 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-25 21:12 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-05-03 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-04 0:00 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf/x86/mbm: Fix mbm counting when RMIDs are reused Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:44 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 20:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 21:43 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 21:49 ` Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-23 0:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf/x86/cqm: Support cqm/mbm only for perf events Vikas Shivappa
2016-04-25 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-25 16:23 ` Luck, Tony
2016-04-25 20:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160425200222.GM3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.