From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 23:42:10 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Message-ID: <20160425214210.GJ1881@hermes.click-hack.org> References: <20160418143032.GZ11630@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20160425143644.GI11630@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20160425195054.GH1881@hermes.click-hack.org> <20160425200932.GK11630@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20160425202341.GI1881@hermes.click-hack.org> <20160425213103.GL11630@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160425213103.GL11630@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] kernel 3.12 List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Lennart Sorensen Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:31:03PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:23:41PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > pre and post patches allow applying an I-pipe patch to a vendor > > kernel. They make it possible for the I-pipe patch to evolve with > > little changes to the pre/post patches. > > Oh right. I guess I have been lucky enough to use a kernel close enough > to upstream to not have a problem. If you took a version of the I-pipe patch and never updated it, then you never had the problem it solves. -- Gilles. https://click-hack.org