From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
cov@codeaurora.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, lenb@kernel.org, harish.k@hpe.com,
ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:36:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426183611.GC27803@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460914617-8259-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 01:36:53PM -0400, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Code has been redesigned to calculate penalty requirements on the fly. This
> significantly simplifies the implementation and removes some of the init
> calls from x86 architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
For all four patches:
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> index ededa90..cc0ba16 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>
> #include "internal.h"
>
> @@ -440,7 +441,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi_pci_link *link, int irq)
> #define ACPI_MAX_IRQS 256
> #define ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ 16
>
> -#define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE (0)
> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE (16*16)
> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING (16*16*16)
> #define PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL (16*16*16*16)
> @@ -457,9 +457,9 @@ static int acpi_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_IRQS] = {
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL, /* IRQ6 */
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL, /* IRQ7 parallel, spurious */
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_TYPICAL, /* IRQ8 rtc, sometimes */
> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE, /* IRQ9 PCI, often acpi */
> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE, /* IRQ10 PCI */
> - PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE, /* IRQ11 PCI */
> + 0, /* IRQ9 PCI, often acpi */
> + 0, /* IRQ10 PCI */
> + 0, /* IRQ11 PCI */
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED, /* IRQ12 mouse */
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED, /* IRQ13 fpe, sometimes */
> PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED, /* IRQ14 ide0 */
> @@ -467,6 +467,60 @@ static int acpi_irq_penalty[ACPI_MAX_IRQS] = {
> /* >IRQ15 */
> };
>
> +static int acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(int irq)
> +{
> + struct acpi_pci_link *link;
> + int penalty = 0;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(link, &acpi_link_list, list) {
> + /*
> + * If a link is active, penalize its IRQ heavily
> + * so we try to choose a different IRQ.
> + */
> + if (link->irq.active && link->irq.active == irq)
> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> + else {
> + int i;
> +
> + /*
> + * If a link is inactive, penalize the IRQs it
> + * might use, but not as severely.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < link->irq.possible_count; i++)
> + if (link->irq.possible[i] == irq)
> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_POSSIBLE /
> + link->irq.possible_count;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return penalty;
> +}
> +
> +static int acpi_irq_get_penalty(int irq)
> +{
> + int penalty = 0;
> +
> + if (irq < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQ)
> + penalty += acpi_irq_penalty[irq];
> +
> + /*
> + * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict
> + * with PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be
> + * use for PCI IRQs.
> + */
> + if (irq == acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt) {
> + u32 type = irq_get_trigger_type(irq) & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> +
> + if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)
> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> + else
> + penalty += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> + }
> +
> + penalty += acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(irq);
> + return penalty;
> +}
> +
> int __init acpi_irq_penalty_init(void)
> {
> struct acpi_pci_link *link;
> @@ -547,12 +601,12 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
> * the use of IRQs 9, 10, 11, and >15.
> */
> for (i = (link->irq.possible_count - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
> - if (acpi_irq_penalty[irq] >
> - acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.possible[i]])
> + if (acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) >
> + acpi_irq_get_penalty(link->irq.possible[i]))
> irq = link->irq.possible[i];
> }
> }
> - if (acpi_irq_penalty[irq] >= PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS) {
> + if (acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) >= PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS) {
> printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "No IRQ available for %s [%s]. "
> "Try pci=noacpi or acpi=off\n",
> acpi_device_name(link->device),
> @@ -568,7 +622,6 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct acpi_pci_link *link)
> acpi_device_bid(link->device));
> return -ENODEV;
> } else {
> - acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
> acpi_device_name(link->device),
> acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);
> @@ -800,9 +853,10 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
> continue;
>
> if (used)
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> + PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
> else
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_AVAILABLE;
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = 0;
>
> if (retval != 2) /* no next number */
> break;
> @@ -819,34 +873,19 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used)
> */
> void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active)
> {
> - if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
> - if (active)
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
> - else
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> - }
> + if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty))
> + acpi_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
> + active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> }
>
> bool acpi_isa_irq_available(int irq)
> {
> return irq >= 0 && (irq >= ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty) ||
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> + acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) < PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Penalize IRQ used by ACPI SCI. If ACPI SCI pin attributes conflict with
> - * PCI IRQ attributes, mark ACPI SCI as ISA_ALWAYS so it won't be use for
> - * PCI IRQs.
> - */
> void acpi_penalize_sci_irq(int irq, int trigger, int polarity)
> {
> - if (irq >= 0 && irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_irq_penalty)) {
> - if (trigger != ACPI_MADT_TRIGGER_LEVEL ||
> - polarity != ACPI_MADT_POLARITY_ACTIVE_LOW)
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_ALWAYS;
> - else
> - acpi_irq_penalty[irq] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> - }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 17:36 [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements Sinan Kaya
2016-04-17 17:36 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce static IRQ array size to 16 Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 18:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-17 17:36 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] acpi,pci,irq: remove redundant code in acpi_irq_penalty_init Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 18:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-17 17:36 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] acpi,pci,irq: remove SCI penalize function Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 18:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2016-04-26 19:00 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements Sinan Kaya
2016-04-26 20:33 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-04-26 20:33 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-02 17:44 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-02 17:44 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-02 17:58 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-03 16:17 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-03 16:17 ` Nalla, Ravikanth
2016-05-03 17:16 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-04-27 0:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-04-27 0:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-05-05 23:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160426183611.GC27803@localhost \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=harish.k@hpe.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.