All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH arm 1/1] arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:36:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426213630.GV5995@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160426212630.GV3715@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [160426 14:27]:
> Done!  These are at -rcu:
> 
> 6eeec2b4a50c (arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle)
> 0efee3da3b29 (arm: Use more _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle)
> b6cdf6d22f52 (arm: Additional _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle)
> 70da6fb7275b (arm: Whack another event-trace-from-idle mole)
> 019db9102c6c (arm: Whack yet another event-trace-from-idle mole)
> ebcd2861ae27 (arm: Whack an expected event-trace-from-idle mole)
> 
> So how would you like these handled?  I would be happy to send a fresh
> patch series or git pull request if you would like to send them up your
> tree, or I can send them up my usual path.  Just let me know!

Probably best to keep them in your rcu tree, at least I'm not seeing
any conflicts with my for-next with these.

> And I would guess that other hardware and other configurations will
> cause other moles to pop their heads up, but you never know.

Heh yeah I'm sure we'll see some more :)

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH arm 1/1] arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:36:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426213630.GV5995@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160426212630.GV3715@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [160426 14:27]:
> Done!  These are at -rcu:
> 
> 6eeec2b4a50c (arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle)
> 0efee3da3b29 (arm: Use more _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle)
> b6cdf6d22f52 (arm: Additional _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle)
> 70da6fb7275b (arm: Whack another event-trace-from-idle mole)
> 019db9102c6c (arm: Whack yet another event-trace-from-idle mole)
> ebcd2861ae27 (arm: Whack an expected event-trace-from-idle mole)
> 
> So how would you like these handled?  I would be happy to send a fresh
> patch series or git pull request if you would like to send them up your
> tree, or I can send them up my usual path.  Just let me know!

Probably best to keep them in your rcu tree, at least I'm not seeing
any conflicts with my for-next with these.

> And I would guess that other hardware and other configurations will
> cause other moles to pop their heads up, but you never know.

Heh yeah I'm sure we'll see some more :)

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-26 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-25 20:48 [PATCH arm 1/1] arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-25 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-25 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 15:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 15:00   ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 17:52   ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 17:52     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 18:29     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 18:29       ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 19:07       ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:07         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:39         ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 19:39           ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 19:44           ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 19:44             ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 19:51             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:51               ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:52               ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 19:52                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 20:06                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:06                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:51             ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 19:51               ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 20:06               ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:06                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:11                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:11                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:25                   ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 20:25                     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 20:25                     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 20:41                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:41                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:46                       ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 20:46                         ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 20:52                         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 20:52                           ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 21:08                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 21:08                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 21:04                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 21:04                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 21:04                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 21:12                           ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 21:12                             ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 21:26                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 21:26                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 21:36                               ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-04-26 21:36                                 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 20:16                 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 20:16                   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 20:36                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 20:36                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:47           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:47             ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:17       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 19:17         ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 19:41         ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 19:41           ` Tony Lindgren
2016-04-26 19:42         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:42           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-04-26 19:49           ` Steven Rostedt
2016-04-26 19:49             ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160426213630.GV5995@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.