From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:36816 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27027146AbcD0Af1XMEF8 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 02:35:27 +0200 Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id bt5so12579646pac.3 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:35:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kAGm62OqMRH6+lOgkOMN/RdwsYRuuG71l3LG8zNekLU=; b=BsX1ELScwMAxhyo8nBnXashvP8O85df6CzjZox5cTQaPjgcsRoZYIga8bS9bDFpqWo FijRZwYk1a9Ur6KXE90L/VVZCqhJNHuDC7OTnVQXs6YVGYChLV8RtjI/z7mDRtD2G6y3 78WLQ0/KfoQ4UsAMP8iJQB4sAeW7bFPnyE8XvJtB7QUCbc6tUtuA/7EwzsGY6DeHvGw3 vOH4oF3iY4avfaneKo1RZcwIb+A00eTPlCnzfRA7ku3vYFjWBmk5jpPjneYaieTJ9289 gPgSiX8H9T7GNF/qFwaS8GnHNkGFnXwpWNjwSuEg5Uy8gnPfH/CPjkpWZjlKMnaUWtMq uTrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=kAGm62OqMRH6+lOgkOMN/RdwsYRuuG71l3LG8zNekLU=; b=UTQOs+jxKtBD5QeG4diPk4u4JU2lRT8DJyhXZ3zutN+K1mZokLR8SeHUhv+bY+uuY/ mmEY/WlB/pKrH0hUwXLXnF0Y3eRusdvh2VPD2KzQEDJQQp/hJ61drbCctmMxgUMi9JWm HjwNljKfrcBUFJpKtH/JLcQe4S38T6qvFSQMPDEgfEMwfpCleuaQy2EGx6Dpk4M1sSzz ySD1dmlScHLPfBSFyvDtErBRzzMstOvW+0AJaawmkpP3qZzew02Q5R+/Jet/0J0LlGBP aTE/lHyireABWpyVlZRABKZAfZl4UFy7zJDvrNAkpcEYaxbEWCtEnFpVT/3gWwC6Qj0e psNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW1KjH5i2jMZ3C5BKe6bAOjJw8P2DcvIWxgaMEgPTTEiGgiy8x1uBnzi4Vj5t0w0Q== X-Received: by 10.66.218.161 with SMTP id ph1mr7650398pac.83.1461717321615; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:35:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([110.70.50.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m184sm1191026pfb.22.2016.04.26.17.35.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:36:54 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Russell King , Daniel Thompson , Jiri Kosina , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Sergey Senozhatsky , Chris Metcalf , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-cris-kernel@axis.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Cleaning printk stuff in NMI context Message-ID: <20160427003654.GB4782@swordfish> References: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 53234 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On (04/21/16 13:48), Petr Mladek wrote: > v5 adds changes suggested by Sergey Senozhatsky. It should not longer > conflict with his async printk patchset. passes my tests. (apart from that cosmetic-nano-nit) the series looks good to me Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky -ss From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sergey Senozhatsky Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:36:54 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Cleaning printk stuff in NMI context Message-Id: <20160427003654.GB4782@swordfish> List-Id: References: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> In-Reply-To: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On (04/21/16 13:48), Petr Mladek wrote: > v5 adds changes suggested by Sergey Senozhatsky. It should not longer > conflict with his async printk patchset. passes my tests. (apart from that cosmetic-nano-nit) the series looks good to me Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky -ss From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com (Sergey Senozhatsky) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 09:36:54 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] Cleaning printk stuff in NMI context In-Reply-To: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> References: <1461239325-22779-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.com> Message-ID: <20160427003654.GB4782@swordfish> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On (04/21/16 13:48), Petr Mladek wrote: > v5 adds changes suggested by Sergey Senozhatsky. It should not longer > conflict with his async printk patchset. passes my tests. (apart from that cosmetic-nano-nit) the series looks good to me Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky -ss