From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Herbszt Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/57] Add HP MSA 2040 to the hardware table Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 00:06:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20160429000605.00006561@localhost> References: <1461755458-29225-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1461755458-29225-6-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1461755458-29225-6-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Sebastian Herbszt , Mike Snitzer , Christophe Varoqui List-Id: dm-devel.ids Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke > --- > libmultipath/hwtable.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) You missed adding it to multipath.conf.defaults. > diff --git a/libmultipath/hwtable.c b/libmultipath/hwtable.c > index a4ae053..28ee595 100644 > --- a/libmultipath/hwtable.c > +++ b/libmultipath/hwtable.c > @@ -175,6 +175,21 @@ static struct hwentry default_hw[] = { > .prio_name = PRIO_ALUA, > .prio_args = NULL, > }, > + { > + /* HP MSA 1040/2040 product family */ > + .vendor = "HP", > + .product = "MSA (1|2)040 SA(N|S)", > + .features = DEFAULT_FEATURES, > + .hwhandler = DEFAULT_HWHANDLER, > + .pgpolicy = GROUP_BY_PRIO, > + .pgfailback = -FAILBACK_IMMEDIATE, > + .rr_weight = RR_WEIGHT_NONE, > + .no_path_retry = 18, > + .minio = 100, > + .checker_name = TUR, > + .prio_name = PRIO_ALUA, > + .prio_args = NULL, > + }, > > { > /* HP SVSP */ Any reason for a separate entry and not merging it with "HP MSA2000 product family with new firmware" ? Sebastian