From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoffer Dall Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Add support for KVM with ACPI Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:21:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20160503082124.GA17923@cbox> References: <1460388780-914-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@arm.com> <57220C73.7010900@arm.com> <20160502125414.GR27057@io.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C1749B8D for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 04:18:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bbjJBr2o3qKE for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 04:18:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EBBA49B81 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 04:18:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id g17so24557163wme.1 for ; Tue, 03 May 2016 01:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160502125414.GR27057@io.lakedaemon.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Jason Cooper Cc: al.stone@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Marc Zyngier , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, fu.wei@linaro.org, gg@slimlogic.co.uk List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:54:14PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [+ Thomas, Jason] > > > > Do you have any objection against this going through the KVM tree? The > > dependencies are rather intricate, and Daniel gave us his green light > > already for the clocksource part. > > > > If you'd rather maintain the usual flow, please let us know and we'll > > deal with it. > > I've no objection. > > Acked-by: Jason Cooper > Just to be clear, that's on all the irqchip patches, right? Thanks! -Christoffer From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall) Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:21:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Add support for KVM with ACPI In-Reply-To: <20160502125414.GR27057@io.lakedaemon.net> References: <1460388780-914-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@arm.com> <57220C73.7010900@arm.com> <20160502125414.GR27057@io.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20160503082124.GA17923@cbox> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:54:14PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [+ Thomas, Jason] > > > > Do you have any objection against this going through the KVM tree? The > > dependencies are rather intricate, and Daniel gave us his green light > > already for the clocksource part. > > > > If you'd rather maintain the usual flow, please let us know and we'll > > deal with it. > > I've no objection. > > Acked-by: Jason Cooper > Just to be clear, that's on all the irqchip patches, right? Thanks! -Christoffer From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755416AbcECIVE (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2016 04:21:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:38851 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750819AbcECIVB (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2016 04:21:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:21:24 +0200 From: Christoffer Dall To: Jason Cooper Cc: Marc Zyngier , Julien Grall , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Thomas Gleixner , fu.wei@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wei@redhat.com, al.stone@linaro.org, gg@slimlogic.co.uk, hanjun.guo@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Add support for KVM with ACPI Message-ID: <20160503082124.GA17923@cbox> References: <1460388780-914-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@arm.com> <57220C73.7010900@arm.com> <20160502125414.GR27057@io.lakedaemon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160502125414.GR27057@io.lakedaemon.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 12:54:14PM +0000, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:13:23PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > [+ Thomas, Jason] > > > > Do you have any objection against this going through the KVM tree? The > > dependencies are rather intricate, and Daniel gave us his green light > > already for the clocksource part. > > > > If you'd rather maintain the usual flow, please let us know and we'll > > deal with it. > > I've no objection. > > Acked-by: Jason Cooper > Just to be clear, that's on all the irqchip patches, right? Thanks! -Christoffer