All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
	eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] perf: Introduce address range filtering
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 10:56:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160503085651.GL3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461771888-10409-6-git-send-email-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:44:46PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Many instruction trace pmus out there support address range-based
> filtering, which would, for example, generate trace data only for a
> given range of instruction addresses, which is useful for tracing
> individual functions, modules or libraries. Other pmus may also
> utilize this functionality to allow filtering to or filtering out
> code at certain address ranges.
> 
> This patch introduces the interface for userspace to specify these
> filters and for the pmu drivers to apply these filters to hardware
> configuration.
> 
> The user interface is an ascii string that is passed via an ioctl
> and specifies (in the form of an ascii string) address ranges within
> certain object files or within kernel. There is no special treatment
> for kernel modules yet, but it might be a worthy pursuit.
> 
> The pmu driver interface basically add two extra callbacks to the
> pmu driver structure, one of which validates the filter configuration
> proposed by the user against what the hardware is actually capable of
> doing and the other one translates hardware-independent filter
> configuration into something that can be programmed into the
> hardware.

Alexander, could you please write a manpage patch for this new API?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-03  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-27 15:44 [PATCH v2 0/7] perf: Introduce address range filtering Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] perf: Move set_filter() from behind EVENT_TRACING Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:45   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Move set_filter() out of CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] perf/x86/intel/pt: Move MSR bit definitions to a private header Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:45   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Move PT specific " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] perf/x86/intel/pt: IP filtering register/cpuid bits Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add IP filtering register/CPUID bits tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] perf: Extend perf_event_aux_ctx() to optionally iterate through more events Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] perf: Introduce address range filtering Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-28 17:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-29 18:12   ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-04-30  4:59     ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-02 14:31       ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-05-03  8:56   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-05-05  9:46   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] perf/x86/intel/pt: Add support for address range filtering in PT Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:47   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin
2016-04-27 15:44 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] perf: Let userspace know if pmu supports address filters Alexander Shishkin
2016-05-05  9:47   ` [tip:perf/core] perf/core: Let userspace know if the PMU " tip-bot for Alexander Shishkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160503085651.GL3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.