From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Huawei Xie <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio: split virtio rx/tx queue
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 17:03:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160505000327.GT5641@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462323027-91942-1-git-send-email-huawei.xie@intel.com>
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 08:50:27AM +0800, Huawei Xie wrote:
> -int virtio_dev_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> - int queue_type,
> - uint16_t queue_idx,
> +static int
> +virtio_dev_cq_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
While it's good to split Rx/Tx specific stuff, but why are you trying to
remove a common queue_setup function that does common setups, such as vring
memory allocation.
This results to much duplicated code: following diff summary also shows
it clearly:
7 files changed, 655 insertions(+), 422 deletions(-)
which makes it harder for maintaining.
> -}
> + rxvq = (struct virtnet_rx *)RTE_PTR_ADD(vq,
> + sizeof(*vq) + vq_size * sizeof(struct vq_desc_extra));
> + rxvq->vq = vq;
> + vq->sw_ring = sw_ring;
sw_ring is needed for rx queue only, why not moving it to rx queue struct?
> static void
> -virtio_update_packet_stats(struct virtqueue *vq, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
> +virtio_update_rxq_stats(struct virtnet_rx *rxvq, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
> {
> uint32_t s = mbuf->pkt_len;
> struct ether_addr *ea;
>
> if (s == 64) {
> - vq->size_bins[1]++;
> + rxvq->stats.size_bins[1]++;
> } else if (s > 64 && s < 1024) {
> uint32_t bin;
>
> /* count zeros, and offset into correct bin */
> bin = (sizeof(s) * 8) - __builtin_clz(s) - 5;
> - vq->size_bins[bin]++;
> + rxvq->stats.size_bins[bin]++;
> } else {
> if (s < 64)
> - vq->size_bins[0]++;
> + rxvq->stats.size_bins[0]++;
> else if (s < 1519)
> - vq->size_bins[6]++;
> + rxvq->stats.size_bins[6]++;
> else if (s >= 1519)
> - vq->size_bins[7]++;
> + rxvq->stats.size_bins[7]++;
> }
>
> ea = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, struct ether_addr *);
> if (is_multicast_ether_addr(ea)) {
> if (is_broadcast_ether_addr(ea))
> - vq->broadcast++;
> + rxvq->stats.broadcast++;
> else
> - vq->multicast++;
> + rxvq->stats.multicast++;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +virtio_update_txq_stats(struct virtnet_tx *txvq, struct rte_mbuf *mbuf)
Why not taking "struct virtnet_stats *stats" as the arg, so that we
don't have to implment two exactly same functions.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.h
> index a76c3e5..ced55a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,59 @@
> #define RTE_PMD_VIRTIO_RX_MAX_BURST 64
>
> #ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSSE3
> -int virtio_rxq_vec_setup(struct virtqueue *rxq);
> +
> +struct virtnet_stats {
Another remind again: you should put following codes before the
"#ifdef".
--yliu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-04 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 0:50 [PATCH] virtio: split virtio rx/tx queue Huawei Xie
2016-05-05 0:03 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-05-05 1:54 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-05 3:07 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-05 3:29 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-05 3:50 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-05 5:29 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-09 5:14 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-09 5:44 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-09 16:02 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-24 13:38 ` Huawei Xie
2016-05-25 10:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-25 15:01 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-27 9:07 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-30 2:40 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-30 3:03 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-05-30 8:17 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-05-30 9:06 ` [PATCH v3] " Huawei Xie
2016-06-01 7:15 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-02 6:38 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-06-02 6:43 ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-06-01 16:12 ` Huawei Xie
2016-06-02 8:09 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-06-03 2:53 ` Yuanhan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160505000327.GT5641@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.