From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: cpufreq governors broken with !CONFIG_SMP? Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:49:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20160506114930.GY3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160505234922.GA14673@sky.smuckle.net> <1961527.dEtpL4HAvs@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160506002519.GB14673@sky.smuckle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:57709 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757956AbcEFLtb (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 May 2016 07:49:31 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160506002519.GB14673@sky.smuckle.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Muckle Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:25:19PM -0700, Steve Muckle wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 02:09:07AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > In turn, schedutil should probably depend on CONFIG_SMP. > > In the long term I wonder if it's worth putting PELT under its own > separate feature or just removing #ifdef CONFIG_SMP. Probably should do that eventually yeah. It started out with being smp&&cgroup only, then we started using it for regular balancing and it became smp, and since we're now wanting to use it for pretty much everything we should just remove that.