All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] xserver_xorg-server: use -O2 build optimization level
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 23:33:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160506233356.18752d8d@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572C8ACE.4010307@zacarias.com.ar>

Hello Gustavo,

On Fri, 6 May 2016 09:15:10 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> wrote:

> On 06/05/16 03:47, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the patch, will surely improve the 'out of the box' usability of buildroot,
> > but I would prefer a 'blacklist' of known failing combinations and simply disable
> > xserver (with comment why) in this case(s), the only know to me is RPi1:
> >
> >    BR2_ARCH="arm"
> >    BR2_GCC_TARGET_CPU="arm1176jzf-s"
> >    BR2_OPTIMIZE_S=y
> >
> > The perfect solution would be a fix for gcc (and/or xserver)...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Peter
> 
> Hi Peter.
> Isn't that a bit harsh?

Ups, sorry, apologize for my wrong/misleading wording, was not meant so...

> I'm not 100% comfortable with this solution either, however blacklisting 
> xorg will be messy to put it lightly.

Yes, did not catch it that more than one combination is affected (thought it
was only RPi1....until sending the first e-mail, and only afterward registered
the original post was about RPi2...
 
> Also finding the failing combinations will not be simple - it seems ARM 
> in general is affected on several toolchain combinations, as is MIPS as 
> well (both tested in Qemu) - so it goes beyond some particular platforms.

Mind to share your configs and test commands (specially the MIPS one)?

> Another alternative could be finding the exact gcc option that's causing 
> it diffing the output of --help=optimizers and trying enabling/disabling 
> one by one until it's fixed or fails since this would probably help 
> pinpoint the precise optimizations that's causing it (which would in 
> turn help in making a minimal test case to help upstream).
> Regards.

Thanks for the suggestion, will try it with a test case...

Regards,
Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-06 21:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-06  0:08 [Buildroot] [PATCH] xserver_xorg-server: use -O2 build optimization level Gustavo Zacarias
2016-05-06  6:47 ` Peter Seiderer
2016-05-06  6:55   ` Peter Seiderer
2016-05-06 12:15   ` Gustavo Zacarias
2016-05-06 21:33     ` Peter Seiderer [this message]
2016-05-06 13:51 ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160506233356.18752d8d@gmx.net \
    --to=ps.report@gmx.net \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.