From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Waiman.Long@hpe.com,
jason.low2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] locking/rwsem: Drop superfluous waiter refcount
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:39:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160509073933.GC3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462769770-29363-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 09:56:08PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> Read waiters are currently reference counted from the time it enters
> the slowpath until the lock is released and the waiter is awoken. This
> is fragile and superfluous considering everything occurs within down_read()
> without returning to the caller, and the very nature of the primitive does
> not suggest that the task can disappear from underneath us. In addition,
> spurious wakeups can make the whole refcount useless as get_task_struct()
> is only called when setting up the waiter.
So I think you're wrong here; imagine this:
rwsem_down_read_failed() rwsem_wake()
get_task_struct();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&wait_lock);
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &wait_list);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wait_lock);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&wait_lock)
__rwsem_do_wake()
while (true) {
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
waiter->task = NULL
if (!waiter.task) // true
break;
__set_task_state(tsk, TASK_RUNNING);
do_exit();
wake_up_process(tsk); /* BOOM */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-09 7:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-09 4:56 [PATCH -tip 0/4] locking/rwsem (xadd): Reader waiter optimizations Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 4:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] locking/rwsem: Avoid stale ->count for rwsem_down_write_failed() Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 5:36 ` Peter Hurley
2016-05-09 7:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 14:29 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 4:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] locking/rwsem: Drop superfluous waiter refcount Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 7:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-05-09 15:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 16:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 18:51 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 18:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 4:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] locking/rwsem: Enable lockless waiter wakeup(s) Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 4:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] locking/rwsem: Rework zeroing reader waiter->task Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-09 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 1:31 ` [PATCH -tip 0/4] locking/rwsem (xadd): Reader waiter optimizations Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160509073933.GC3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.