From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from kirsty.vergenet.net ([202.4.237.240]:52974 "EHLO kirsty.vergenet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753569AbcEJADb (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 20:03:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 09:03:48 +0900 From: Simon Horman To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: arm@kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , Kevin Hilman , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Magnus Damm Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM64 Based SoC DT PM Domain Updates for v4.7 Message-ID: <20160510000348.GC4530@verge.net.au> References: <20160506002125.GE24999@verge.net.au> <41128314.QPDQXbTtHX@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41128314.QPDQXbTtHX@wuerfel> Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 03:10:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 06 May 2016 09:21:25 Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:20:10PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM64 based SoC DT PM Domain updates for v4.7. > > > > > > This pull requests is based on a merge of: > > > > > > * "[GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC R-Car SYSC Updates for > > > v4.7", tagged as renesas-rcar-sysc2-for-v4.7, which you have already > > > pulled > > > * "[GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM64 Based SoC DT Updates for v4.7", > > > tagged as renesas-arm64-dt2-for-v4.7, which I have sent a pull request > > > for. > > > > > > The reason for the somewhat tedious base on > > > renesas-rcar-sysc2-for-v4.7, which provides driver changes, > > > is a hard run-time dependency. > > > > > > I also have a similar set of changes for ARM (32-bit) which I will send > > > separately. > > > > I am wondering if this pull-request might have slipped through the cracks. > > > > FWIW, all other pull requests I have submitted for v4.7 have been pulled > > (thanks!) including a similar pull-request for ARM (32-bit) which is > > present in the next/late branch of the arm-soc tree. > > > > I do not plan to send any more non-fix pull requests for v4.7. > > And at this stage I am not aware of any fixes for v4.7. > > > > Indeed it did, thanks for the reminder! I've put it on my stack now > and should start doing merges later today when I'm through my mail. Great, thanks! I see that it has now been pulled. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 09:03:48 +0900 Subject: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM64 Based SoC DT PM Domain Updates for v4.7 In-Reply-To: <41128314.QPDQXbTtHX@wuerfel> References: <20160506002125.GE24999@verge.net.au> <41128314.QPDQXbTtHX@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20160510000348.GC4530@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 03:10:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 06 May 2016 09:21:25 Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:20:10PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM64 based SoC DT PM Domain updates for v4.7. > > > > > > This pull requests is based on a merge of: > > > > > > * "[GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC R-Car SYSC Updates for > > > v4.7", tagged as renesas-rcar-sysc2-for-v4.7, which you have already > > > pulled > > > * "[GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM64 Based SoC DT Updates for v4.7", > > > tagged as renesas-arm64-dt2-for-v4.7, which I have sent a pull request > > > for. > > > > > > The reason for the somewhat tedious base on > > > renesas-rcar-sysc2-for-v4.7, which provides driver changes, > > > is a hard run-time dependency. > > > > > > I also have a similar set of changes for ARM (32-bit) which I will send > > > separately. > > > > I am wondering if this pull-request might have slipped through the cracks. > > > > FWIW, all other pull requests I have submitted for v4.7 have been pulled > > (thanks!) including a similar pull-request for ARM (32-bit) which is > > present in the next/late branch of the arm-soc tree. > > > > I do not plan to send any more non-fix pull requests for v4.7. > > And at this stage I am not aware of any fixes for v4.7. > > > > Indeed it did, thanks for the reminder! I've put it on my stack now > and should start doing merges later today when I'm through my mail. Great, thanks! I see that it has now been pulled.