From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gris Ge Subject: Re: Introducing libstoragemgmt as a Ceph dependency Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:34:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20160511063425.GC2683@redhat.com> References: <5732D0A1.7020209@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59694 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751059AbcEKGec (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 02:34:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5732D0A1.7020209@suse.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tim Serong Cc: "Handzik, Joseph" , Sage Weil , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "tasleson@redhat.com" --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:26:41PM +1000, Tim Serong wrote: > On 05/04/2016 04:22 AM, Handzik, Joseph wrote: > > [...] > >> I'm giving all the above for context, but what I really need to know= =20 > >> from the ceph-devel community is: Does anyone have any concerns with= =20 > >> adding libstoragemgmt as a Ceph dependency? It would only work for the= =20 > >> standard Linux flavors and distros (Rhel and Centos, OpenSuse and=20 > >> SLES, Debian and Ubuntu). The features I'm adding would be no-ops or= =20 > >> disabled for other distros unless someone in the community finds a way= =20 > >> to distribute libstoragemgmt for their operating environment or finds= =20 > >> an adequate replacement for the functionality. It's also worth noting= =20 > >> that I'm completely dependent on the previously mentioned 1.3 release= =20 > >> of libstoragemgmt, which is why I've waited on this for a while (the= =20 > >> blueprint was initially intended for Jewel). > >=20 > > The current distros upstream currently buidls on are: > >=20 > > centos 7 > > ubuntu 16.04 > > ubuntu 14.04 > > debian 8 (jessie) > >=20 > > Other packages are all down downstream (e.g., opensuse and sles). > >=20 > > Anyway, is libstoragemgt available for the above? > >=20 > > [JH] - I'm seeing packages for both 16.04 and 14.04, along with Debian = Jessie and Centos7. I think my biggest challenge will be figuring out *exac= tly* when the 1.3 release of libstoragemgmt is available for all these dist= ros. I don't plan to submit a pull until I can confirm that. >=20 > Speaking for a downstream, a quick search shows we've got libstoragemgmt > 1.2.x (not 1.3) on the current latest versions of openSUSE and SLES. Hi Tim, We are doing some final tests before tag libstoragemgmt release 1.3. For openSUSE and SLES, I will submit this branch back via OBS once released: https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:cathay4t:branches:Base:System/= libstoragemgmt Best regards. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Tim > --=20 > Tim Serong --=20 Gris Ge --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXMtJxAAoJEGzN5Y/kHij/PbUP/33N27hLHhvsOFNJBnNQhCHR IdoTAdPrvV2jvRmp7MXclA2TSSqXua2EwlVwBw3h/aW8Nb34hFNzwmgaM94UoA7I +0cLUQF4/Vj0iKSOGEaMyviTpGs/+gWi3tr+9Z0d+WVoVhAQBy9/0wSZGDvzfDAO YXc+ISDygJHh2IfudXUsHE/YgJKU+W4KcnOD/IvM09Rqvy4TNgNuc2ecAzw9GRYX QKEQRXrQ5131NHlGcIwOBLd5I0xulFvA4LLQ0hkTeUfe1/2dMd+1HIF6zzJrM3lU jkmhTMdYzbC4GQEp7vrzBQRqylepwk3gHDA2XFlwBJGY7HztlR3NwkKUDzkRHKRK J1f2ULH0T9jMZQP4YDvUW3vVKtxgPnF9/9oaN1PONOIoBJf+dsBzNzHlvvc1ea1H exfa7TIx6YiDCeYv0NNJ4mwP1ouoqlzjGBG95Alkn1pm5u8kU4xti9m43UlvhjFg t4asdybg+JRPIGCkgsr/Rrg4KYZPlK66djsyiqNrcSIFRi2ytCIV/4bsQlnjJeza TXyp8nSPnpjp5nAkMcslc2v10EFMxJ64UjtPh+Ht7REjrf6Kqitm7wiTfj9O9bel vmSTzjvalvbyNl8k49qqtYOKsCos6muS4Q+0oqlS4CSwVNrB8EqFdLiUMOY1B6SY Pk2hjwaKM2810HwTE0tO =/aaH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --c3bfwLpm8qysLVxt--