From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:38864 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751379AbcEKI41 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 04:56:27 -0400 Received: from localhost by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 11 May 2016 02:56:26 -0600 Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by d03dlp02.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F213E40030 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 02:56:24 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u4B8uO6V37552146 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 08:56:24 GMT Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u4B8uNd5018221 for ; Wed, 11 May 2016 04:56:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 01:56:26 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] qqz: Improve accuracy of cross-links Message-ID: <20160511085626.GD3515@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <571C1843.1060906@gmail.com> <571C1C8F.9000602@gmail.com> <57307D90.3050200@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57307D90.3050200@redhat.com> Sender: perfbook-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Akira Yokosawa , perfbook@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 24/04/2016 03:08, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > > This commit also updates the copyright notices in the header, > > including the name of Paolo Bonzini who authored the commit > > mentioned above. > > Not sure what's Paul's policy about copyright and authors in files (the > "Copyright (C)" stuff dates back to before the US joined the Berne > Convention; and authorship is recorded well in git logs). My employer also dates before the Berne convention, so no problem here. > Apart from this, I agree with the meat of the change. I didn't know > about the \newcounter{}[] syntax, hence my hack using \setcounter. I expect both the original and the improvement to be quite welcome, especially for people reading this on small form-factor devices! Thanx, Paul