From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752109AbcEKJw0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 05:52:26 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43026 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751129AbcEKJwZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2016 05:52:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:52:20 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: zengzhaoxiu@163.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, andi@firstfloor.org, dvyukov@google.com, Zhaoxiu Zeng , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Denys Vlasenko Subject: Re: [patch V4 09/31] bitops: Add x86-specific parity functions Message-ID: <20160511095220.GC2180@pd.tnic> References: <1462955158-28394-1-git-send-email-zengzhaoxiu@163.com> <1462958205-24890-1-git-send-email-zengzhaoxiu@163.com> <20160511093139.GA3206@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20160511093139.GA3206@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:31:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > How many bytes does that end up being? Should we make it a call? Those should call __arch_hweight* anyway - no need for the duplication at all. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) --