From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ext4: DAX fixes
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:56:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160513135600.GA2996@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160513052419.GD5862@thunk.org>
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:24:19AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Queued and I'm running tests before I push them out. The patches
> passed the smoke tests[1], and the full tests should be running for the
> next seven hours or so at: http://104.197.222.91
So the good news is that the full tests ("gce-xfstests full") look
really good[1]) Unfortunately the DAX tests ("gce-xfstests -c dax -g
auto") show a regression. Is this expected? (i.e., were you
expecting test regressions that will be fixed by the DAX patch
series?)
Before this patch series:
BEGIN TEST dax: Ext4 4k block using DAX Fri May 13 08:01:57 EDT 2016
Failures: generic/250 generic/252 generic/299 generic/338
After the patch series:
CMDLINE: -c dax -g auto
FSTESTVER: e2fsprogs v1.43-WIP-2015-05-18-64-g2334bd3 (Sat, 5 Sep 2015 22:21:35 -0400)
FSTESTVER: fio fio-2.6-8-ge6989e1 (Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:09:48 -0700)
FSTESTVER: quota 67fd9cc (Mon, 4 Apr 2016 00:32:39 -0400)
FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v4.3.0 (Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:24:24 +1100)
FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld ccae8d1 (Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:42:18 -0400)
FSTESTVER: xfstests linux-v3.8-1010-g97dd2d8 (Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:04:44 -0400)
FSTESTVER: kernel 4.6.0-rc4-ext4-00022-gaacd0c8 #282 SMP Fri May 13 00:52:07 EDT 2016 x86_64
FSTESTCFG: "dax"
FSTESTSET: "-g auto"
FSTESTEXC: ""
FSTESTOPT: "aex"
MNTOPTS: ""
CPUS: "4"
MEM: "13052.8"
MEM: 26 GB (Max capacity)
BEGIN TEST dax: Ext4 4k block using DAX Fri May 13 01:21:58 EDT 2016
Failures: generic/075 generic/091 generic/112 generic/127 generic/231 generic/250 generic/252 generic/263 generic/299 generic/338 generic/340
- Ted
[1] CMDLINE: full
FSTESTVER: e2fsprogs v1.43-WIP-2015-05-18-64-g2334bd3 (Sat, 5 Sep 2015 22:21:35 -0400)
FSTESTVER: fio fio-2.6-8-ge6989e1 (Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:09:48 -0700)
FSTESTVER: quota 67fd9cc (Mon, 4 Apr 2016 00:32:39 -0400)
FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v4.3.0 (Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:24:24 +1100)
FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld ccae8d1 (Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:42:18 -0400)
FSTESTVER: xfstests linux-v3.8-1010-g97dd2d8 (Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:04:44 -0400)
FSTESTVER: kernel 4.6.0-rc4-ext4-00018-g816cd71 #279 SMP Thu May 5 22:45:36 EDT 2016 x86_64
FSTESTCFG: "4k 1k ext3 encrypt nojournal ext3conv adv dioread_nolock data_journal bigalloc bigalloc_1k"
FSTESTSET: "-g auto"
FSTESTEXC: ""
FSTESTOPT: "aex"
MNTOPTS: ""
CPUS: "2"
MEM: "7497.07"
MEM: 7680 MB (Max capacity)
BEGIN TEST 4k: Ext4 4k block Thu May 5 22:52:10 EDT 2016
Passed all 212 tests
BEGIN TEST 1k: Ext4 1k block Thu May 5 23:38:50 EDT 2016
Failures: generic/018
BEGIN TEST ext3: Ext4 4k block emulating ext3 Fri May 6 00:30:11 EDT 2016
Passed all 167 tests
BEGIN TEST encrypt: Ext4 encryption Fri May 6 01:15:41 EDT 2016
Failures: ext4/020
BEGIN TEST nojournal: Ext4 4k block w/ no journal Fri May 6 01:40:25 EDT 2016
Failures: ext4/301
BEGIN TEST ext3conv: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc and no flex_bg Fri May 6 02:20:39 EDT 2016
Passed all 212 tests
BEGIN TEST adv: Ext4 advanced features (inline_data, metadata_csum, 64bit) Fri May 6 03:06:25 EDT 2016
Passed all 211 tests
BEGIN TEST dioread_nolock: Ext4 4k block w/dioread_nolock Fri May 6 03:53:34 EDT 2016
Passed all 212 tests
BEGIN TEST data_journal: Ext4 4k block w/data=journal Fri May 6 04:40:52 EDT 2016
Failures: ext4/271 generic/018
BEGIN TEST bigalloc: Ext4 4k block w/bigalloc Fri May 6 05:28:12 EDT 2016
Failures: ext4/004 generic/204 generic/219 generic/235 generic/273
BEGIN TEST bigalloc_1k: Ext4 1k block w/bigalloc Fri May 6 06:18:54 EDT 2016
Failures: ext4/004 generic/204 generic/235 generic/270
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-13 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-11 9:39 [PATCH 0/4] ext4: DAX fixes Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] ext4: Handle transient ENOSPC properly for DAX Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] ext4: Fix race in transient ENOSPC detection Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` [PATCH 3/4] ext4: Refactor direct IO code Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] ext4: Pre-zero allocated blocks for DAX IO Jan Kara
2016-05-11 9:39 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-13 5:24 ` [PATCH 0/4] ext4: DAX fixes Theodore Ts'o
2016-05-13 13:56 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2016-05-16 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-16 14:26 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-16 15:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-05-16 15:13 ` Dan Williams
2016-05-16 15:59 ` Jan Kara
2016-05-16 18:29 ` Dan Williams
2016-05-16 20:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160513135600.GA2996@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.