From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched/core: Add debug code to catch missing update_rq_clock()
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 10:14:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160515021439.GC8790@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463082593-27777-6-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Hi Matt,
Thanks for Ccing me.
I am indeed interested, because I recently encountered an rq clock
issue, which is that the clock jumps about 200ms when I was
experimenting the "flat util hierarchy" patches, which really annoyed
me, and I had to stop to figure out what is wrong (but haven't yet
figured out ;))
First, this patchset does not solve my problem, but never mind, by
reviewing your patches, I have some comments:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:49:53PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> - rq->clock_skip_update = 0;
> + /* Clear ACT, preserve everything else */
> + rq->clock_update_flags ^= RQCF_ACT_SKIP;
The comment says "Clear ACT", but this is really xor, and I am not sure
this is even what you want.
In addition, would it be simpler to do this?
update_rq_clock()
if (flags & RQCF_ACT_SKIP)
flags <<= 1; /* effective skip is an update */
return;
flags = RQCF_UPDATED;
Thanks,
Yuyang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-15 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-12 19:49 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] sched: Diagnostic checks for missing rq clock updates Matt Fleming
2016-05-12 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Update the rq clock before detaching tasks Matt Fleming
2016-05-12 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched: Add wrappers for lockdep_(un)pin_lock() Matt Fleming
2016-05-12 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched/core: Reset RQCF_ACT_SKIP before unpinning rq->lock Matt Fleming
2016-05-12 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Push rq lock pin/unpin into idle_balance() Matt Fleming
2016-05-12 19:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched/core: Add debug code to catch missing update_rq_clock() Matt Fleming
2016-05-15 2:14 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2016-05-16 9:46 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-16 20:11 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-17 12:24 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-17 19:01 ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-18 8:41 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-18 22:51 ` Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160515021439.GC8790@intel.com \
--to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.