From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
osstest service owner <osstest-admin@xenproject.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 94442: regressions - FAIL
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:39:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160516093911.GI8974@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57399305.3070309@citrix.com>
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 10:29:41AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/05/16 10:24, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 02:57:13AM +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
> >> flight 94442 xen-unstable real [real]
> >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/94442/
> > [...]
> >> test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 9 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 94368
> > The changes in this flight shouldn't cause failure like this. See below.
> >
> > It is more likely to be caused by SMEP/SMAP fix, which are now in
> > master. It seems that previous run didn't discover this.
>
> Indeed - definitely from the SMEP/SMAP fix. What kind of hardware is
> italia0?
>
I can only tell it is an Intel box from the serial log.
I'm afraid if you need more information we need to wait until Ian comes
back.
> In the meantime, I need to fix stack traces to prevent them assuming the
> presence of a frame pointer in debug builds. This isn't true for some
> of the hand rolled assembly (or for calls through the EFI firmware).
>
Is this related to this bug?
Shall we revert the series now? I don't want it to block pushing to
master for too long.
Wei.
> ~Andrew
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-16 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-16 2:57 [xen-unstable test] 94442: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2016-05-16 9:24 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-16 9:29 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-05-16 9:39 ` Wei Liu [this message]
2016-05-16 9:42 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-05-17 8:59 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-17 9:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-05-17 9:08 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-17 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-17 10:57 ` Jan Beulich
2016-05-17 13:08 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160516093911.GI8974@citrix.com \
--to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=osstest-admin@xenproject.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.