From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@sgi.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI fix
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 12:20:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160517102049.GB26924@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160517094655.GB21993@codeblueprint.co.uk>
* Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May, at 10:04:34AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> >
> > Now I'm wondering whether other users of FRAME_BEGIN/FRAME_END make
> > this same mistake. Coccinelle might be able to detect it perhaps.
>
> A quick bit of sed turned up the code in arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S,
> which looks to suffer from the same bug,
That would be arch/x86/entry/thunk_64.S, but yeah, good find!
> /* rdi: arg1 ... normal C conventions. rax is saved/restored. */
> .macro THUNK name, func, put_ret_addr_in_rdi=0
> .globl \name
> .type \name, @function
> \name:
> FRAME_BEGIN
>
> /* this one pushes 9 elems, the next one would be %rIP */
> pushq %rdi
> pushq %rsi
> pushq %rdx
> pushq %rcx
> pushq %rax
> pushq %r8
> pushq %r9
> pushq %r10
> pushq %r11
>
> .if \put_ret_addr_in_rdi
> /* 9*8(%rsp) is return addr on stack */
> movq 9*8(%rsp), %rdi
> .endif
>
> With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y 9*8(%rsp) is actually the value of %rbp on
> entry, not the return address.
This seems to affect:
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
THUNK trace_hardirqs_on_thunk,trace_hardirqs_on_caller,1
THUNK trace_hardirqs_off_thunk,trace_hardirqs_off_caller,1
#endif
and with TRACE_IRQFLAGS we already in most times force frame pointers, such as
when LOCKDEP is enabled:
config LOCKDEP
bool
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
...
select FRAME_POINTER if !MIPS && !PPC && !ARM_UNWIND && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARC && !SCORE
Also, unlike the efi_call() case, this thunk_64.S bug affects the quality of
debug/tracing information, not runtime correctness per se.
still all that is by accident, not by design - this bug should be fixed too.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-16 14:46 [GIT PULL] EFI fix Ingo Molnar
2016-05-16 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-16 20:23 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-05-16 22:40 ` Alex Thorlton
2016-05-17 6:30 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/efi: Fix 7-parameter efi_call()s tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2016-05-17 9:04 ` [GIT PULL] EFI fix Matt Fleming
2016-05-17 9:46 ` Matt Fleming
2016-05-17 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-05-17 14:43 ` [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: fix stack return address retrieval in thunk Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-17 16:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-17 16:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2016-05-17 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-17 17:25 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-17 18:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-17 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-19 9:12 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/entry/64: Fix " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-23 12:08 ` [GIT PULL] EFI fix Matt Fleming
2016-05-23 12:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-05-24 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-18 9:17 Ingo Molnar
2019-05-19 17:45 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-01-11 7:46 Ingo Molnar
2019-01-11 14:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-11 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-12 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-01-11 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-01-12 8:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-30 6:21 Ingo Molnar
2018-11-30 21:00 ` pr-tracker-bot
2018-07-30 17:44 Ingo Molnar
2018-07-13 19:57 Ingo Molnar
2017-06-10 8:31 Ingo Molnar
2016-04-28 17:48 Ingo Molnar
2016-04-16 9:08 Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160517102049.GB26924@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=athorlton@sgi.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.