From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [libnetfilter_conntrack PATCH 1/3] src: add support for IPv6 to struct __nfct_nat
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 17:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160517154549.GA1998@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146348943198.4910.10995009662328384564.stgit@nfdev2.cica.es>
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:50:32PM +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> @@ -114,18 +129,34 @@ int __setobjopt(struct nf_conntrack *ct, unsigned int option)
>
> static int getobjopt_is_snat(const struct nf_conntrack *ct)
> {
> - return ((test_bit(ATTR_STATUS, ct->head.set) ?
> - ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT_DONE : 1) &&
> - ct->repl.dst.v4 !=
> - ct->head.orig.src.v4);
> + if (!(test_bit(ATTR_STATUS, ct->head.set) ?
> + ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT_DONE : 1))
> + return 0;
Better untangle this code:
if (!test_bit(ATTR_STATUS, ct->head.set))
return 0;
if (!(ct->status & IPS_SRC_NAT_DONE))
return 0;
switch (ct->head.orig.l3protonum) {
case AF_INET:
return ct->repl.dst.v4 != ct->head.orig.src.v4;
default:
return 0;
}
> + switch (ct->head.orig.l3protonum) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + return ct->repl.dst.v4 != ct->head.orig.src.v4;
> + case AF_INET6:
> + return 0;
It is a bit strange to me that you add in this patch all these:
case AF_INET6:
return 0;
I'd rather see you adding this in 2/3 when you implement IPv6 support.
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-17 12:50 [libnetfilter_conntrack PATCH 0/3] support for IPv6 NAT Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2016-05-17 12:50 ` [libnetfilter_conntrack PATCH 1/3] src: add support for IPv6 to struct __nfct_nat Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2016-05-17 15:45 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-05-17 12:50 ` [libnetfilter_conntrack PATCH 2/3] src: add support for IPv6 NAT Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
2016-05-17 15:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-05-17 12:50 ` [libnetfilter_conntrack PATCH 3/3] qa: update test_api with " Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160517154549.GA1998@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=arturo.borrero.glez@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.