From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] EFI ARM Xen support Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 11:49:00 +0100 Message-ID: <20160518104900.GH21993@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <20160514190410.GA2283@codeblueprint.co.uk> <573AF50E.9090206@citrix.com> <20160518104638.GA19191@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160518104638.GA19191-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stefano Stabellini , David Vrabel , tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuEi8DpZVb4nw@public.gmane.org, Shannon Zhao , Shannon Zhao , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 May, at 12:46:38PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I have no particular objections, since this seems to be Xen-next merged to the EFI > tree that is already upstream, plus this single commit on top of t: > > 11ee5491e5ff Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI > > Which, if Matt is fine with it, you could send to Linus too as part of this > cycle's Xen pull request. Sure, I'm fine with that. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk (Matt Fleming) Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 11:49:00 +0100 Subject: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] EFI ARM Xen support In-Reply-To: <20160518104638.GA19191@gmail.com> References: <20160514190410.GA2283@codeblueprint.co.uk> <573AF50E.9090206@citrix.com> <20160518104638.GA19191@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20160518104900.GH21993@codeblueprint.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 18 May, at 12:46:38PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I have no particular objections, since this seems to be Xen-next merged to the EFI > tree that is already upstream, plus this single commit on top of t: > > 11ee5491e5ff Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI > > Which, if Matt is fine with it, you could send to Linus too as part of this > cycle's Xen pull request. Sure, I'm fine with that. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753052AbcERKtH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2016 06:49:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:38067 "EHLO mail-wm0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752268AbcERKtD (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 May 2016 06:49:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 11:49:00 +0100 From: Matt Fleming To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Stefano Stabellini , David Vrabel , tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Shannon Zhao , Shannon Zhao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] EFI ARM Xen support Message-ID: <20160518104900.GH21993@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <20160514190410.GA2283@codeblueprint.co.uk> <573AF50E.9090206@citrix.com> <20160518104638.GA19191@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160518104638.GA19191@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+41 (02bc14ed1569) (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 18 May, at 12:46:38PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I have no particular objections, since this seems to be Xen-next merged to the EFI > tree that is already upstream, plus this single commit on top of t: > > 11ee5491e5ff Xen: EFI: Parse DT parameters for Xen specific UEFI > > Which, if Matt is fine with it, you could send to Linus too as part of this > cycle's Xen pull request. Sure, I'm fine with that.