From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Piotr =?utf-8?B?RGHFgmVr?= Subject: Re: Weekly performance meeting APAC time? Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 08:16:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20160519061659.GD22208@predictor> References: <20160518190828.GC22208@predictor> <09a57ed5-d9b4-d599-ddd3-a3b3496dd9c5@redhat.com> <104170944.77164509.1463621856704.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from predictor.org.pl ([185.5.97.54]:36705 "EHLO predictor.org.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbcESGOs (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 May 2016 02:14:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <104170944.77164509.1463621856704.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 09:37:36PM -0400, Brad Hubbard wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > On 05/18/2016 02:08 PM, Piotr Da=C5=82ek wrote: > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:41:36AM -0500, Mark Nelson wrote: > > >> Josh mentioned at today's performance meeting that the current > > >> 8:00AM PST time is inconvenient for some folks he's talked with = that > > >> live in the APAC region who would like to attend. I'd like to f= ind > > >> out how many other folks feel this way as well? Would folks be > > >> interested in staggering the meeting every other week with somet= hing > > >> like a 6:00PM PST (9:00AM Beijing) next day) time? > > > > > > This means 3:00 AM for everyone in CET and 2:00 AM in GMT... Well= , > > > cant't satisfy everyone I guess. > > > > >=20 > > Yeah, that's what I'm concerned about. Even if we did it, it would= only > > be every other week. First I want to see how many people respond s= aying > > they would even like this change though. >=20 > I was actually the driver behind this I think. Primarily I just wante= d to > discuss a project I'm working on and get some feedback from the perf = team. The > regular scheduled meeting is at 0100 my time so I raised that as a bi= t of an > issue (soft, I know :) ). I think any modification to the meeting tim= e though > needs to be proportional so maybe 1 in 4 is more appropriate? I guess= it > depends on the level of interest here in the APAC region which you ar= e trying > to gauge. For me this is probably more of a one off than an ongoing c= ommitment > to attending the meeting. >=20 > While we are at it I noticed that http://pad.ceph.com/p/performance_w= eekly > does not seem to include any recordings from this year although each = meeting > entry says "See recording...". Are these archived somewhere else or m= aybe the > dates are incorrect? Same here. As I'm no longer able to attend a perf meeting every week, h= aving recording available would be a huge help and would make the meeting sch= edule a non-issue (any discussions could be continued on next meeting(s) and/= or mailing list/IRC).=20 --=20 Piotr Da=C5=82ek branch@predictor.org.pl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html