From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:39672 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27031859AbcETQkNIWL1d (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:13 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.14.8) with ESMTP id u4KGeAJE007337; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:10 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u4KGe865007336; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:08 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:08 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Alexander Viro , Andrew Morton , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, James Hogan , Paul.Burton@imgtec.com Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ELF/MIPS build fix Message-ID: <20160520164008.GC13016@linux-mips.org> References: <20160520141705.GA1913@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 53563 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 05:37:17PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > CONFIG_MIPS32_N32=y but CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF disabled results in the following > > linker errors: > > Is this for a configuration with native (n64) ELF disabled, but one or > more compat ELF formats (o32, n32) enabled? An interesting use case then. Yes. Fairly sensible for one of those systems where we only support 64 bit kernels but don't need a 64 bit userland. Ralf