From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751454AbcEUFEl (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2016 01:04:41 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56774 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087AbcEUFEj (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 May 2016 01:04:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 22:04:38 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: William Breathitt Gray , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Driver core update for 4.7-rc1 Message-ID: <20160521050438.GA9445@kroah.com> References: <20160521032350.GA6595@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:51:18PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > > > William Breathitt Gray (13): > > base: isa: Remove X86_32 dependency > > isa: Decouple X86_32 dependency from the ISA Kconfig option > > So I'm going to revert these unless I get > > (a) a good reason for them > > (b) patches to get rid of the incessant warnings these cause. What warnings? I haven't seen any reports of warnings, what .config causes them? > Most of the ISA drivers are not 64-bit safe. They give compiler > warnings, and they will definitely simply not work. So just blindly > enabling that shit is not the answer. > > We've never needed this before, why do we need it now? I'll let William answer that, it seems he has some crazy isa hardware for x86_64 platforms... thanks, greg k-h