Re: zone_reclaimable() leads to livelock in __alloc_pages_slowpath()

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 05/21, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> On 2016/05/21 5:28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > It spins in __alloc_pages_slowpath() forever, __alloc_pages_may_oom() is never
> > called, it doesn't react to SIGKILL, etc.
> >
> > This is because zone_reclaimable() is always true in shrink_zones(), and the
> > problem goes away if I comment out this code
> >
> > 	if (global_reclaim(sc) &&
> > 	    !reclaimable && zone_reclaimable(zone))
> > 		reclaimable = true;
> >
> > in shrink_zones() which otherwise returns this "true" every time, and thus
> > __alloc_pages_slowpath() always sees did_some_progress != 0.
> >
>
> Michal Hocko's OOM detection rework patchset that removes that code was sent
> to Linus 4 hours ago. ( https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=146378862415399 )
> Please wait for a few days and try reproducing using linux.git .

I guess you mean
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/mm/vmscan.c?id=fa8c5f033ebb43f925d68c29d297bafd36af7114
"mm, oom: rework oom detection"...

Yes thanks a lot Tetsuo, it should fix the problem.

Cough I can't resist I hate Michal^W the fact this was already fixed ;) Because
it took me some time to understand whats going on, initially it looked like some
subtle and hard-to-reproduce bug in userfaultfd.

Thanks!

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>