Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address resolution module into core

[Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1449 bytes --]

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 07:36:03PM +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > On 05/18/2016 02:28 PM, Mark Bloch wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 8:59 PM
> > >> To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> > >> Cc: Mark Bloch <markb-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>; leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org; linux-
> > >> rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address
> > >> resolution module into core
> > >>
> > >> On 05/18/2016 01:15 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:51:02AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > >>>> moves it into the ib_core and also keep the new ib_netlink stuff in
> > >>>> ib_core.  So, fewer modules, not more.
> > >>>
> > >>> What about getting rid of ib_sa as well so we can avoid that dynamic
> > >>> netlink registration patch too?
> > >>
> > >> That's fine too.
> > > Integrating ib_sa into ib_core also means to do the same for ib_mad.
> > > If you agree with it (ib_sa & ib_mad becoming part of ib_core), I'll create
> > the patches.
> > 
> > Ira, Hal?
> > 
> 
> I don't see a problem with that.

Doug,

Will it be acceptable to you if Mark base his patches on this assumption?

Thanks.

> 
> Ira
> 

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]