From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46299)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>) id 1b4q5B-0007eL-4t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:39:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>) id 1b4q56-0000Ak-U5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:39:44 -0400
Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:49168)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>) id 1b4q56-0000A3-Ny
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:39:40 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:40:38 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Message-ID: <20160523134038.GM5641@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1462896240-30999-1-git-send-email-marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
	<20160510191834-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<765120244.1305129.1462897730889.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
	<CAJ+F1C+-8gWchXuFxPGU9gGRyHcCfpn4h+-2LhWCqU7b-MpfYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160515123951-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160515123951-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] RFCv3: vhost-user: simple
 reconnection support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Marc-Andr=E9?= Lureau <marcandre.lureau@gmail.com>, QEMU <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>, jonshin@cisco.com, Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>, marcandre lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:42:12PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > FYI, I have a follow up series (~20 patches,
> > https://github.com/elmarco/qemu/tree/vhost-user-reconnect) doing
> > mostly cleanups and extra checks for disconnection at run time. In
> > particular, it should avoid some obvious crashers/asserts, and
> > prevents qemu from running as long the initial vhost_user_start()
> > didn't succeed (so initial flags are set). I would like to know how to
> > proceed with the follow-up: should I resend the whole series or should
> > we review/merge this rfc first (even though it is known to be
> > incomplete in many disconnect cases that the follow up fixes).
> > 
> > thanks
> 
> I think a gradual merge is better.

+1

May I ask what's the plan to merge this patch set? DPDK has some
dependency on this patch set.

	--yliu