From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in 4.6.0-git - bisected to commit dd254f5a382c
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 01:18:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160524001854.GW14480@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57437683.30008@lwfinger.net>
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 04:30:43PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> The mainline kernels past 4.6.0 fail hang when logging in. There are no
> error messages, and the machine seems to be waiting for some event that
> never happens.
>
> The problem has been bisected to commit dd254f5a382c ("fold checks into
> iterate_and_advance()"). The bisection has been verified.
>
> The problem is the call from iov_iter_advance(). When I reinstated the old
> macro with a new name and used it in that routine, the system works.
> Obviously, the call that seems to be incorrect has some benefits. My
> quich-and-dirty patch is attached.
>
> I will be willing to test any patch you prepare.
Hangs where and how? A reproducer, please... This is really weird - the
only change there is in the cases when
* iov_iter_advance(i, n) is called with n greater than the remaining
amount. It's a bug, plain and simple - old variant would've been left in
seriously buggered state and at the very least we want to catch any such
places for the sake of backports
* iov_iter_advance(i, 0) - both old and new code leave *i unchanged,
but the old one dereferences i->iov[0], which be pointing beyond the end of
array by that point. The value read from there was not used by the old code,
at that.
Could you slap WARN_ON(size > i->count) in the very beginning of
iov_iter_advance() (the mainline variant) and see what triggers on your
reproducer?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-24 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-23 21:30 Regression in 4.6.0-git - bisected to commit dd254f5a382c Larry Finger
2016-05-24 0:18 ` Al Viro [this message]
2016-05-24 2:55 ` Larry Finger
2016-05-24 16:10 ` Larry Finger
2016-05-24 16:28 ` Al Viro
2016-05-24 18:39 ` Larry Finger
2016-05-24 19:13 ` Matthew McClintock
2016-05-24 19:16 ` Larry Finger
2016-05-24 19:25 ` Matthew McClintock
2016-05-24 19:36 ` Larry Finger
2016-05-24 22:31 ` Matthew McClintock
2016-05-24 23:41 ` Al Viro
2016-05-25 0:58 ` Matthew McClintock
2016-05-25 1:10 ` Al Viro
2016-05-25 1:20 ` Matthew McClintock
2016-05-25 1:28 ` Al Viro
2016-05-25 2:06 ` Matthew McClintock
2016-05-25 3:21 ` Al Viro
2016-05-25 6:24 ` Al Viro
2016-05-25 14:28 ` Larry Finger
2016-05-25 15:27 ` Matthew McClintock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160524001854.GW14480@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.