Re: Re: [PATCH v8 0/7] Rework of tpm_tis to share common logic across phy's (lpc/spi/-i2c-)

[Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>]

Thanks Peter! I'll add your and Stefans Reviewed/Tested-by's before
I merge these to next (will happen around rc5).

/Jarkko

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:59:10AM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Thanks for all your efforts!!! I'm sorry I couldn't participate more. :(
> So thanks a lot to all of you for taking care of this.
> 
> 
> a quick testrun (x86) seemed okay and the patchset looks good to me
> reviewed-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
> tested-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
> 
> 
> I'll try to give it a more detailled testrun on the spi and i2c tpms I have and let you know if I find something.
> 
> 
> Since we are making a big change in the subsystem - does it make sense to deprecate, the old, vendor specific, mainly 1.1b, tpm drivers?
> Every time I check on a system, they initally are running on these old drivers instead of tpm_tis. :/
> For now I would probably group them under a new kconfig symbol (deprecated vendor specific drivers) so they are still available for users who really want to use them, but don't get selected by default in distro kernels.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
>