All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: fix first task of a task group is attached twice
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:44:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160531004400.GO18670@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtAoPL_gVgM9t2E_7UTZxahypb14zpU7e8WdK+=ae5v+WQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:28:30AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Yuyang,
> 
> On 30 May 2016 at 21:48, Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> >> The cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time is initialize to 0 with the main effect
> >> that the 1st sched_entity that will be attached, will keep its
> >> last_update_time set to 0 and will attached once again during the
> >> enqueue.
> >> Initialize cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time to 1 instead.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> - add initialization of load_last_update_time_copy for not 64bits system
> >> - move init into init_cfs_rq
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> - rq_clock_task(rq_of(cfs_rq)) can't be used because lock is not held
> >>
> >>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> >> index 218f8e8..86be9c1 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> >> @@ -8459,6 +8459,16 @@ void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> >>       cfs_rq->min_vruntime_copy = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> >>  #endif
> >>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >> +     /*
> >> +      * Set last_update_time to something different from 0 to make
> >> +      * sure the 1st sched_entity will not be attached twice:once
> >> +      * when attaching the task to the group and one more time when
> >> +      * enqueueing the task.
> >> +      */
> >
> > The first time: "once when attaching the task to the group".
> >
> > That attaching is purely wrong, but will not have any effect (at least
> > load/util wise), because the task will later be inited in
> > init_entity_runnable_average().
> 
> This patch is not related to the init of a task but related to the
> init of the cfs_rq and to what happen with the 1st task that is
> enqueued on it.
> 
> Lets take a task A that has already been scheduled on other cfs_rq so
> its se->avg.last_update_time is different from 0.

I understand it, finally, :)
 
> Create a new task group TGB
> At creation, the cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time of this TGB is set to 0.
> 
> Now move task A on TGB.
> A is attached to TGB so  se->avg.last_update_time =
> cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time which is 0
> A is then enqueued on th cfs_rq and because se->avg.last_update_time
> == 0, A will be attached one more time on the cfs_rq
> 
> This patch set cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time to 1 at creation so the
> 1st time that A is attached to TGB,  se->avg.last_update_time =
> cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time = 1 and A will not bve attached one more
> time during the enqueue.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-31  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-24 13:08 [PATCH] sched: fix first task of a task group is attached twice Vincent Guittot
2016-05-25 15:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Vincent Guittot
2016-05-25 22:38   ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-26  8:26     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-26  0:40       ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-26  8:51         ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-27 15:48   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-05-27 17:16     ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-27 20:38       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-05-30  7:04         ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-30 15:52           ` [PATCH v3] " Vincent Guittot
2016-05-30 19:48             ` Yuyang Du
2016-05-31  7:28               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-31  0:44                 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2016-06-01 15:31             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-06-01 15:54               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-06 19:32                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2016-06-07  7:35                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-15 19:19             ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-16  7:12               ` Vincent Guittot
2016-06-15 23:24                 ` Yuyang Du
2016-06-16  9:42                   ` Vincent Guittot
2016-05-30 15:54         ` [PATCH v2] " Vincent Guittot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160531004400.GO18670@intel.com \
    --to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.