Re: [PATCH] KVM: Handle MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL

["Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>]

2016-05-31 03:53-0400, Paolo Bonzini:
> > 2016-05-27 17:22+0200, Radim Krčmář:
> > > (I wonder why MacOS X doesn't read IA32_PERF_STATUS, though.)
> > 
> > Oh, it maybe does ... we already emulate status and return 0x1000 in its
> > bottom 16 bits.  I have no idea what is that supposed to mean, but I
> > think we should return 0x1000 in IA32_PERF_CTL then.
> 
> It's 1000, not 0x1000 (instead, on real hardware the value is typically a
> multiple of 256).  It was added for Darwin too.

Ah, thanks.  (Drivers say that bottom 8 bits are not used.)

> Returning different values is okay, because they are different on real
> hardware too:
> 
> (sudo dd if=/dev/cpu/0/msr skip=$((0x198)) iflag=skip_bytes bs=8 count=1;
>  sudo dd if=/dev/cpu/0/msr skip=$((0x199)) iflag=skip_bytes bs=8 count=1) | od -tx8
> 0000000 00001f3900001100 0000000000001300
>         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>         PERF_STATUS      PERF_CTL
> 
> And perhaps if we returned non-zero values for PERF_CTL Darwin would try to
> write to it.  So returning zero is fine, I think.  There is no correct answer...

Yeah, 0 seems fine.  PERF_CTL the target value for PERF_STATUS, but OS
shouldn't put much trust in those values ... especially under KVM, where
those MSRs make little sense.