From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH next 4/4] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 17:08:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160601170836.3733dbcb@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464791982-10166-5-git-send-email-casantos@datacom.ind.br>
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:39:42 -0300, Carlos Santos wrote:
> diff --git a/Config.in.legacy b/Config.in.legacy
> index a0a2059..3f565e8 100644
> --- a/Config.in.legacy
> +++ b/Config.in.legacy
> @@ -145,6 +145,22 @@ endif
> ###############################################################################
> comment "Legacy options removed in 2016.08"
>
> +config BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_MKIMAGE_FIT_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
> + bool "FIT support in uboot-tools has been refactored"
> + select BR2_LEGACY
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_DTC
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_DTC_PROGRAMS
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_FIT_SUPPORT
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_FIT_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_MKIMAGE
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_DTC
> + select BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_UBOOT_TOOLS_FIT_SUPPORT
I did not review the entire patch, but those last two lines look
incorrect. The purpose of the
BR2_PACKAGE_UBOOT_TOOLS_MKIMAGE_FIT_SIGNATURE_SUPPORT option was to
enable support for FIT signature in the *target* variant of
uboot-tools. Hence, I don't see why you are selecting host-dtc and FIT
support in the host variant of uboot-tools.
> diff --git a/package/uboot-tools/0003-Make-FIT-support-really-optional.patch b/package/uboot-tools/0003-Make-FIT-support-really-optional.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5404e4f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/package/uboot-tools/0003-Make-FIT-support-really-optional.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +From ddcd6cd622889a2d74d0a16efae8e3b2d098f717 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
> +Date: Sun, 8 May 2016 11:11:39 -0300
> +Subject: [PATCH] Make FIT support really optional
> +
> +Due to some mistakes in the source code, it was not possible to really
> +turn FIT support off. This commit fixes the problem by means of the
> +following changes:
> +
> +- Enclose "bootm_host_load_image" and "bootm_host_load_images" between
> + checks for CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE, in common/bootm.c.
> +
> +- Enclose the declaration of "bootm_host_load_images" between checks for
> + CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE, in common/bootm.h.
> +
> +- Condition the compilation and linking of fit_common.o fit_image.o
> + image-host.o common/image-fit.o to CONFIG_FIT=y, in tools/Makefile.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Carlos Santos <casantos@datacom.ind.br>
It would be good to mention the upstream status of this patch. At least
so that I remember instead of asking you again and again if it has been
sent upstream :-)
I'll do a full review later on. Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-01 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 14:38 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] uboot-tools: add missing dependency on host-dtc for the host package Carlos Santos
2016-05-05 20:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-05 20:17 ` Peter Korsgaard
2016-05-05 21:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-05-05 20:32 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-05 20:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-05 21:27 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-05-05 21:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-05 21:44 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-05-06 12:02 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-06 11:59 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 " Carlos Santos
2016-05-06 13:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-08 19:39 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-08 19:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional Carlos Santos
2016-05-08 19:46 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-28 13:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-31 17:33 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-31 19:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-05-31 19:40 ` Carlos Santos
2016-05-31 19:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 0/4] uboot-tools: fix support for Flat Image Trees (FIT) Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 1/4] uboot-tools: use $(TARGET_STRIP) for target utilities Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 2/4] uboot-tools: improve the help text of existing options Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 3/4] uboot-tools: re-generate patches to match v2016.05 Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 14:39 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 4/4] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional Carlos Santos
2016-06-01 15:08 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2016-06-03 19:35 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4] " Carlos Santos
2016-06-07 2:25 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v5] util-linux: rework utilities menu for finer control Carlos Santos
2016-07-05 15:11 ` Romain Naour
2016-07-06 2:43 ` Carlos Santos
2016-07-06 2:55 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6] " Carlos Santos
2016-07-06 21:54 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-07-08 20:33 ` Carlos Santos
2016-07-08 20:52 ` Yann E. MORIN
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 0/3] util-linux: cleanups, additions and reworked utilities menu Carlos Santos
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 1/3] util-linux: clean up libraries and tools selections Carlos Santos
2016-10-16 13:55 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v6] util-linux: rework utilities menu for finer control Carlos Santos
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 2/3] util-linux: expand selection of libraries and utilities Carlos Santos
2016-10-16 13:56 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-07-10 1:16 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v7 3/3] util-linux: rework utilities menu for finer control Carlos Santos
2016-10-16 14:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-07 21:12 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4] uboot-tools: fix FIT support and make it optional Thomas Petazzoni
2016-06-01 15:07 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH next 0/4] uboot-tools: fix support for Flat Image Trees (FIT) Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160601170836.3733dbcb@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.