From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Subject: Re: RFC: DPDK Long Term Support
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:17:10 -0700
Message-ID: <20160603181710.GA13454@mhcomputing.net>
References: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE20257B8E3@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
 Markos Chandras <mchandras@suse.de>, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8310B5A45
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  3 Jun 2016 20:17:11 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE20257B8E3@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:07:49PM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> What changes should be backported
> ---------------------------------
> 
> * Bug fixes that don't break the ABI.
> 
> 
> What changes should not be backported
> -------------------------------------
> 
> * API or ABI breaking changes.

I think this part needs some adjusting.

It seems like there should be allowance for bug fixes where the original does 
break ABI but it is possible to make a version that doesn't.

A lot of DPDK bug fixes I see would fall into this category and it isn't 
discussed.

Matthew.