From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86, hotplug: Use zero page for monitor when resuming from hibernation
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:40:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160606164033.GD30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36DF59CE26D8EE47B0655C516E9CE6402876CB97@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:59:06PM +0000, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> > > + if (hibernation_in_resume())
> > > + mwait_ptr = empty_zero_page;
> > > + else
> > > + mwait_ptr = ¤t_thread_info()->flags;
> >
> > Why is this conditional? Is there any case in which the zero page is not also
> > correct?
> I'm thinking of avoid unnecessary wakeup for normal CPU offline, for example,
> if one driver uses the zero page and access it.
Writing to the zero page would be a major fail.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-06 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-06 14:19 [PATCH][RFC] x86, hotplug: Use zero page for monitor when resuming from hibernation Chen Yu
2016-06-06 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-06 15:59 ` Chen, Yu C
2016-06-06 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-06-06 17:34 ` Brian Gerst
2016-06-06 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-06-07 8:03 ` Pavel Machek
2016-06-07 8:44 ` Chen Yu
2016-06-07 9:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-07 9:43 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160606164033.GD30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.